Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/10/2012 11:48 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:33:16 -0700 (PDT), Lasse_radio wrote: I have a groundplane antenna tuned at 125 MHz for the airband and a newly made QFH for NOAA POES. The QFH is inferior compared to my GP. It should be the other way around, that QFH should be a lot better than the GP. True, for most parts of the sky, except for directly overhead where the GP has a big null. You should get about 3dBi from both the GP and QFH antennas. The difference is that the QFH will not have any cross polarization losses, while the ground plane automatically has a -3dB loss from the conversion from RHCP (NOAA-19???) to linear vertical polarization. Excuse my pedantry, but -3dB loss is actually a 3db gain. John |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inferior Microsoft Products Threaten National Security-Obama BuysInto Big Lie | Shortwave | |||
Tin Coated Copper Strand Inferior for Wire HF Ant? | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |