Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 11th 12, 07:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 550
Default My QFH inferior too my GP

On 10/10/2012 11:48 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:33:16 -0700 (PDT), Lasse_radio
wrote:

I have a groundplane antenna tuned at 125 MHz for the airband
and a newly made QFH for NOAA POES. The QFH is inferior compared
to my GP. It should be the other way around, that QFH should
be a lot better than the GP.


True, for most parts of the sky, except for directly overhead where
the GP has a big null. You should get about 3dBi from both the GP and
QFH antennas. The difference is that the QFH will not have any cross
polarization losses, while the ground plane automatically has a -3dB
loss from the conversion from RHCP (NOAA-19???) to linear vertical
polarization.


Excuse my pedantry, but -3dB loss is actually a 3db gain.

John
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inferior Microsoft Products Threaten National Security-Obama BuysInto Big Lie Dave[_18_] Shortwave 10 December 13th 08 02:25 PM
Tin Coated Copper Strand Inferior for Wire HF Ant? Denno Antenna 24 December 30th 07 07:42 PM
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? Cecil Moore Antenna 5 September 24th 03 04:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017