Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William E. Sabin wrote:
I believe (intuitively) that the reactive E and H near-fields collaborate to create an impedance transformation function, in much the same way as a lumped-element reactive L and C network. In other words, energy shuffling between inductive and capacitive fields do the job and the E and H fields modify to the real values of free space. The details of this are murky, But I believe the basic idea is correct. _Optics_, by Hecht, has a section 2.10 - Cylindrical Waves. There is an interesting statement in that section: "No solutions in terms of arbitrary functions can now be found as there were for both spherical and plane waves." The net reactive impedance component on a standing-wave antenna is the result of the superposition of forward and reflected waves on the standing-wave antenna. Presumably, a traveling-wave antenna, like a terminated Rhombic, doesn't have reactive impedance components. So my question is: Since the voltage and current are always in phase in a traveling-wave antenna, is the near field of a traveling-wave antenna ever reactive? -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |