| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
You can still call it a transducer though - or a thigamajig. Such a sophisticated concept deserves better. I suggest "Triactuatedmulticomplicator" or TAMC for short. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:20:49 -0500, W5DXP
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: You can still call it a transducer though - or a thigamajig. Such a sophisticated concept deserves better. I suggest "Triactuatedmulticomplicator" or TAMC for short. Hi Cecil, Given the high dudgeon that attends yet another inflammatory subject, I would offer that antenna is enough - sheesh, didn't someone ask why all the difficulty? It's not rocket surgery after all. :-) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||