Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 19th 03, 03:57 AM
Dr. Slick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote in message . ..

Zc = 376.730 · ohms

That is, the Z of free space is expressed in exactly the same terms as
a carbon composition resistor. Now given the genesis of this debate
is that free space Z is somehow different from the expression of
Radiation Resistance (e.g. 37 Ohms for a monopole) the only possible
rhetorical objection is that free space is not lossy like a carbon
resistor (non-dissipative). Well, neither is the Radiation
Resistance! Even rhetoric fails. ;-)



Thank you Richard! Someone that's making sense on this NG after Roy lost
his sense!


An antenna is a structure that transforms Radiation Resistance into
the Impedance of free space, as shown, and by definition. Both use
identical MKS units, both are identical characteristics.


Ohms are still always Ohms, regardless of what you are measuring.
And it's very interesting that the E and H fields have units of
Volts/meter and Ampere(turn)/meter, which when you divide one by the
other, you get basically Volts/ampere, just like you would in a
transmission line.

But I don't claim that a wave traveling in a transmission line is
the same as a wave traveling through free space, even if Roy claims
this is what i mean.


Slick
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017