LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 26th 03, 11:56 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"J. McLaughlin" wrote:
When certain kinds of engineers provide me with specifications
involving pounds I shudder. Each use is converted into its equivalent
in SI. The context helps. An assumption of the strength of the
gravitational field needs to be used. Then I evaluate their work using
SI (and the same assumption about the gravitational field). In SI,
force and mass are quite distinct.
I continue to be amazed by the awesome ability of some engineers to
use a single term for two entirely different things. Use SI and the
answers are SI.


This captures the essence of the issue. The question is not so much
'are pounds mass or force?', but, rather, 'what did the author
mean when writing pounds?'

An engineer who believes that pounds are always mass will make
just as many errors as one who believes pounds are always force.

....Keith
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017