Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil wrote,
Gene Nygaard wrote: You can, of course, choose not to call this quantity "weight." You can call it mass instead, if you want to. Here's an interesting quote from _University_Physics_ by Young and Freedman: "On the moon, a stone would be just as hard to throw horizontally, but it would be easier to lift." It also says weight is a vector and mass is a scalar. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp You better watch out, Cecil, Gene is liable to write a scathing indictment of your intelligence, integrity, and job fitness, for quoting that. By the way, what ever happened to the old idea that the attraction between two masses was directly proportional to the size of the two masses multiplied together, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them - sort of like positive and negative charge (Coulomb's Law and all that). 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |