LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old June 15th 04, 11:43 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:44:07 GMT, Bob Glenn
wrote:
Thank you, 1,000 is the accepted value then?


Hi Bob,

It was derived from a contrivance of math that ignores the loss of
radiation resistance. After all, the antenna doesn't exist in a
vacuum, and if it did, it would still be surrounded by a medium
shorting it out to the tune of 377Ohms.

It's enough to allow that it will bite (the voltage) if you contact it
in equally contrived circumstances. Put an NE-2 neon bulb at the end
of the antenna to confirm ionizing voltage (60-90V at least). CBers
used to do that with their whips with just 5W.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017