Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:44:07 GMT, Bob Glenn wrote: Thank you, 1,000 is the accepted value then? Hi Bob, It was derived from a contrivance of math that ignores the loss of radiation resistance. After all, the antenna doesn't exist in a vacuum, and if it did, it would still be surrounded by a medium shorting it out to the tune of 377Ohms. It's enough to allow that it will bite (the voltage) if you contact it in equally contrived circumstances. Put an NE-2 neon bulb at the end of the antenna to confirm ionizing voltage (60-90V at least). CBers used to do that with their whips with just 5W. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC And some of us remember before CB. sigh |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |