Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 12:01 AM
H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:44:07 GMT, Bob Glenn
wrote:
Thank you, 1,000 is the accepted value then?


Hi Bob,

It was derived from a contrivance of math that ignores the loss of
radiation resistance. After all, the antenna doesn't exist in a
vacuum, and if it did, it would still be surrounded by a medium
shorting it out to the tune of 377Ohms.

It's enough to allow that it will bite (the voltage) if you contact it
in equally contrived circumstances. Put an NE-2 neon bulb at the end
of the antenna to confirm ionizing voltage (60-90V at least). CBers
used to do that with their whips with just 5W.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


And some of us remember before CB.
sigh


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017