Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Eternal Squire wrote:
Question: to what extent can I shorten the winding while still retaining good signal apeture? about 50 %? More? And what would I need to do (if anything) to compensate for this? 75m mobile antennas are shortened by as much as 88%. Of course, they are not very efficient. But a 50% shortening should result in an acceptable amount of loss. However, hi-Q loading coils are more efficient than helical windings. Tell everyone that the loading coils are varmint guards (snakes, squirrels) for your "birdhouses". A top hat could be disguised as bird perches and would raise the efficiency of your antenna elements. On another note, peak performance from a vertical array requires phasing/matching at the feedpoints. Roy, W7EL, has a computer program that will calculate the lengths of the phasing sections for you - available at www.eznec.com. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |