Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Ian, Thanks for your comments. My hope was to use a v beam instead of a rhombic. The V is relatively easy to steer, especially if the performance doesn't change much if either leg is moved. Note that I hope to leave one leg of the beam fixed and steer the az by varying the position (and the V angle) of the other leg. Not sure how much changing the angle of the V impacts the performance, which is why I asked for someone with modeling software. My hope was to exploit the high gain, simple construction (but poor receive) of the V for transmit only and to use the modest sized FO yagi for receive only. If I can get 19 or 20 db from a big V beam, I can probably tollerate the limited operating time as well, Q's with big guns should take only minutes and medium sized stations should be workable in a 20 minute window. If the computer model predicts a usable gain, I'd like to try putting one up. Regards, Art -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
40M V Beam question | Antenna | |||
40M V Beam question | Antenna | |||
Beam question | Antenna | |||
Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna | |||
TA-33 Beam question | Antenna |