Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Consider 100W at 3.6MHz propagating along some 50 ohm
coax, which terminates suddenly but with 1/4 inch of the central conductor protruding. Now there's no difficulty in feeding all that power into that 1/4 inch because it is so short compared to a wavelength that there is a uniformity of voltage and current along it, and it will be essentially the same as that existing in the last gnat's cock of the coax. Attach a hi-impedance scope probe to the end of that 1/4 inch and all the power being delivered through the coax will be detectable right at the tip of that 1/4 inch. Now, will that 1/4 inch antenna radiate all the power that is being successfully fed to it at 3.6MHz, or will the configuration behave merely as an open-circuit with all the power being reflected back down the coax? A number of contributors to this NG claim that the 1/4 inch stub antenna will radiate the full 100W at 3.6MHz, but I fear that they are sadly mistaken and that their associated infantile outbursts are because they are in denial either about their error, or cannot face up to a challenge to their seemingly-religious faith as to what is happening. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna |