Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-11-03 16:11:14 +0000, Bernie said:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:14:52 +0000, gareth wrote: "gareth" wrote in message ... As I was driving away this morning, I realised that I'd typoed, and then misled myself about the possibilty of using a jet engine. Nobody's perfect! I had meant o say to spin at 1000MHz, or 1,000,000 revs per sec, for the example. For god's sake!!!! or 1,000,000,000 revs per sec!!!!!!!!! When you're trying to hold water in a colander, is there really any point in just plugging one or two holes? After all, rotary machines to produce LF power (but not LF em waves!) were used in the early days of WT, so the rpm x poles must be reasonably achievable. -- Percy Picacity |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
short antennae | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna |