Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 14, 04:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 42
Default Short antennae, et al

On 2014-11-03 16:11:14 +0000, Bernie said:

On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:14:52 +0000, gareth wrote:

"gareth" wrote in message
...

As I was driving away this morning, I realised that I'd typoed, and
then misled myself about the possibilty of using a jet engine. Nobody's
perfect!

I had meant o say to spin at 1000MHz, or 1,000,000 revs per sec, for
the example.


For god's sake!!!! or 1,000,000,000 revs per sec!!!!!!!!!


When you're trying to hold water in a colander, is there really any point
in just plugging one or two holes?


After all, rotary machines to produce LF power (but not LF em waves!)
were used in the early days of WT, so the rpm x poles must be
reasonably achievable.

--

Percy Picacity

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. gareth Antenna 119 February 24th 15 09:54 AM
short antennae gareth Antenna 47 November 1st 14 12:46 PM
The philosophy of short antennae gareth Antenna 3 October 28th 14 06:02 PM
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well gareth Antenna 18 October 28th 14 05:42 PM
Short Antennae gareth Antenna 10 October 11th 14 02:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017