Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Percy Picacity wrote in
: However, this does not change the fact that standing waves do not 'use up' any of the power fed to the aerial Is that like potential vs kinetic energy? After all, a filter could be said to 'store' energy in an eternal oscillation if it had no losses, and nothign drawing output from it. The moment you do, you lose energy, the 'note' fades. Given that if you produce a standing wave in a tank of liquid such that one bulge exists above the rim, the standing wave can be considered a form of storage (potential energy), because that tank will hold more liquid that it would if brim full without the wave. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
Antennae base | Homebrew |