Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... About what? I read what I need to read in order to do whatever it is I need to do. I don't need to read any more about small antennas in order to deal with the likes of you. As you recall, I was probably the first one to jump on you when you falsely claimed that small radiators are inefficient. Anyone that has actually read up on the subject knows that that is not true. If anyone needs to invest in some good textbooks on the subject, it's you. Based upon what you write, I suspect that your textbooks were written by Dr.Seuss. The most advanced of my textbooks, which was a course textbook back in the early 1970s was, "Fields and Waves in Communications Electronics" by Ramo, Whinnery and Van Duzer; Ramo and Whinnery being the R and the W in TRW. Short antennae are poor radiatiors. I refer you to the book, "Antennas" by "Those Engineers Ltd", a Yank book from 1948 that discusses that issue. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
Antennae base | Homebrew |