Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gareth" wrote in message
... "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... As I pointed out in a previous post, the differential term is zero in the absence of one of the fields so the equations have no, non-trivial, solutions. That was not what you said before, and now you are attempting to change history in order to save face. You said that for static fields there were no non-zero differential results and you poured scorn not only on my background, but also on Essex University where I studied. And here is the evidence of your attempt to rewrite history in order to save face, coupled once again with your uncontrollable urge to make nasty comments in passing (Why do you behave like that?) ... -----ooooo----- "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Of course, regardless of the day of the week, Maxwell is much good for a static field. (Differential = 0). The appalling lack of mathematical ability shown by some who claim degrees in engineering really makes you wonder at times. Especially as that would have been in a maths qualification required for any decent Uni. entry. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna & Tuner on 160M Question | Antenna | |||
160m antenna | Antenna | |||
Why did this work (160m antenna)? | Antenna | |||
Outbacker ML-130 160m antenna question | Antenna | |||
question about 160m Isotron Antenna | Antenna |