| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#30
November 10th 14, 08:21 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,uk.radio.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
The prrof of he pudding?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... On 10/11/14 18:46, wrote: Further proof, if any were needed, that a short antenna is a poor radiator. All the proof so far having acutal numbers has been that "a short antenna is a poor radiator" is arm waving nonsense, gas bag, and all you have presented so far is arm waving and no numbers. It is worse than that, he has dismissed solid theory and tried to replace it with his nonsense. Just as he has done in the rotating magnetic thread. In fact, this is his normal mode of operation, he has a long history of such quackery. The pattern is always the same. Post some nonsense theory, often dressed up as being something that has troubled him or he has been studying. The theories are often rambling nonsense- suggesting any studying has been limited to a 'scan' of a few key terms. When people respond, hand out abuse, ignore anything which clearly looks credible, etc. Hand out more abuse. Change theory, claiming people didn't understand. Hand out more abuse. Claim he was right and others were wrong. Don't be surprised if the same theory is recycled several times. Once again, Brian, you jump in with your childish remarks and chanting your false mantra. Why do you behave like that? Why always shout out your childish interjections? Why not contribute to the technical discussion? FYI, it was jimp who originated the abuse by his pejorative use of, "gas bag", but I doubt that the truth of that will suit your own need to want to shout out your own abuse. I have not dismissed any theory. Out your money where your (big) mouth is, and cite your reference. I do not have a history of quackery, unlike youwith your assertion that reversing the direction od a rotating vector makes it reduce in suze, or more recently, claiming that Maxwell's equations for static fields have no non-zero differential terms, or that Maxwell's Equations refer only to EM propagation and not to the whole of electrical phenomenon. (Perhaps it is no surprise that you do an M6CIR and reort to bluster to mask your own technical ineptitude?) I have never changed any theory; I strongly suspect that your problem is that you yourself are the one who only does a quick scan, jumps to some irrelevant conclusion, and then dives in with your own abuse; abuse that you seek to lay at others' doors. For example, your recent faux pas when I was discussing what leads to a standing wave and you jumping in with what is extant AFTER that standing wave has been set up. Physician, heal thyself. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Antenna & Tuner on 160M Question | Antenna | |||
| 160m antenna | Antenna | |||
| Why did this work (160m antenna)? | Antenna | |||
| Outbacker ML-130 160m antenna question | Antenna | |||
| question about 160m Isotron Antenna | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
