Wimpie wrote in :

There is nothing wrong with a jump to another branch of science (for
example astrophysics) to find out whether the statement is right or
wrong.


I agree with that. It looks like a question of scale, not an absolute. I
don't know enough to say much, so I haven't, but if this is like relativistic
effects in that it is real, but extremely insignificant on the scales
presented for discussion, then arguing about it is surely proportional in its
significance.

El 11-11-14 12:43, Lostgallifreyan escribió:
wrote in :

There is nothing wrong with a jump to another branch of science (for
example astrophysics) to find out whether the statement is right or
wrong.


I agree with that. It looks like a question of scale, not an absolute. I
don't know enough to say much, so I haven't, but if this is like relativistic
effects in that it is real, but extremely insignificant on the scales
presented for discussion, then arguing about it is surely proportional in its
significance.

You are right, it is a matter of scale and especially rotation
frequency, but you don't need relativistic velocities to make it
happen. I posted an explanation based on two loops in the same topic.

--
Wim
PA3DJS
Please remove abc first in case of PM