Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Antenna
>
A dipole over ground
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
28
November 16th 14, 08:11 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Helmut Wabnig[_2_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 135
A dipole over ground
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:38:10 -0000,
wrote:
The following shows the effect on elevation pattern for a 1/2 wave
dipole antenna over ground at various heights for perfect, very good,
average, and extremely ground.
The important value to note is the elevation angle for the main lobe.
Generally for DX an elevation angle at or below 30 degrees is desirable
and for NVIS an angle above 60 degrees.
The elevation angles apply to any dipole type antenna, such as a G5RV,
OCF dipole, etc. but the absolute gain values will be quite different.
Also some types of dipoles have more lobes than the two of the 1/2
wave dipole; those lobes will still be elevated.
Perfect V good Avg Ext poor
Height gain @ elev gain @ elev gain @ elev gain @ elev
0.10 8.6 90 6.3 90 4.4 90 3.1 90
0.15 8.4 90 7.1 90 5.8 90 4.3 90
0.20 8.0 90 7.1 90 6.1 90 4.6 66
0.25 7.4 90 6.7 68 5.9 61 4.8 50
0.30 6.9 56 6.4 51 5.9 48 5.1 41
0.35 6.8 45 6.5 42 6.1 40 5.4 35
0.40 7.1 39 6.9 36 6.5 35 5.8 31
0.45 7.7 33 7.5 32 7.0 31 6.3 28
0.50 8.3 30 8.1 29 7.6 28 6.7 25
0.55 8.9 27 8.5 26 7.9 25 6.9 23
0.60 9.1 25 8.6 24 8.0 23 6.9 21
0.65 8.9 23 8.4 22 7.8 21 6.9 20
0.70 8.5 21 8.0 20 7.6 20 6.8 18
0.75 8.0 19 7.7 19 7.3 18 6.7 17
0.80 7.6 18 7.4 18 7.2 17 6.7 16
0.85 7.5 17 7.4 17 7.2 16 6.7 15
0.90 7.6 16 7.5 16 7.3 15 6.9 15
0.95 7.8 15 7.7 15 7.5 15 7.1 14
Special note:
Most people understand that the results of an antenna analysis program
reflect the material used to construct the antenna and the type of
ground, if any, used for the analysis, are an approximation, and are
not accurate to 27 decimal places.
Further, most people also understand that absent them being a part of
the model used for the analysis, objects in the near field of the antenna,
such as, but not limited to, 20 foot prision walls, blimp hangers,
skyscrapers, a deluge of biblical proportions, giant sequoia trees,
hovering 2 mile wide alien spacecraft, hords of locusts, large gold
deposits under the antenna, battles between Autobots and Decepticons,
beached aircraft carriers, and stadium domes may well effect the
actual antenna perfomance.
Your mileage may vary, void where prohibited.
Any spelling mistakes in this article are all entirly my fault. Any grammer
errors spotted in this article were put there because I could.
I have seen people talking about NVIS antennas for DX.
w.
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole.
Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA
Antenna
8
February 24th 11
10:22 PM
Safety ground versus RF ground for a 2nd Floor shack
jawod
Antenna
11
March 14th 06
02:38 AM
Transforming your simple Ground Rod into a Ground Anchor : Is It Worth The Work ? - You Decide !
RHF
Shortwave
10
December 24th 05
10:09 PM
Ground Or Not To Ground Receiving Antenna In Storm ?
Robert11
Antenna
32
December 20th 05
01:52 AM
Improving ground for a Vertical dipole worth it ?
.J.S...
Antenna
9
February 25th 05
12:06 AM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
08:15 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks