| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
November 20th 14, 07:08 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
A dipole over ground
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/20/2014 12:55 PM, the troll wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: snip No, I didn't miss it. But he's just a troll. You throw the word "troll" around a lot when someone disagrees with one of your pronouncements; do you even know what it means? Yes, I know what it means. And you are a perfect example. Right... troll One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks (i.e. 'you're nothing but a fanboy' is a popular phrase) with no substance or relevence to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue. However, you have to understand. He once put up an 80 meter dipole. And it didn't work well. So rather than admitting he screwed up the antenna, he just claims that all 80 meter dipoles under 100' suck. Look back through this newsgroup and you'll see it. That would take magic as I have never in my life put up any sort of 80M dipole nor have I ever in my life lived anywhere that the lot was big enough to put up an 80M dipole. I once put up a 40-30-20-15-10 trap dipole, and even with all the shortening from the traps, there still wasn't enough land to add 80M. You are a lier. Then you should take back your previous statement, troll. As I never stated that I had ever at any time put up an 80M dipole of any kind, I have nothing to take back, lier. -- Jim Pennino |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
