Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 7:31:12 PM UTC-6, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
That depends entirely on the radiation pattern of the antenna. For instance, the sky wave will be that part of the pattern which has fairly high angle of radiation (but lower than the space wave), and the surface wave will have a very low angle of radiation. The space wave will be quite low angle if working from one point on the earth to another point on the earth. Strictly speaking, a space wave could be at any angle, if you include talking from the earth to someone in space. Earth to ISS is space wave. The signals one receives from a local VHF/UHF FM radio or TV station are space wave. Two CB'ers talking to each other 5 miles apart are using space wave. Only in the case of the earth dweller talking to someone in space, or on the moon, etc would be using a space wave at a higher angle than the usual angle needed for sky wave. And on the high HF bands like 10m, in some cases the angles used for skywave can be fairly low if working DX. But those angles would still likely be a bit higher than terrestrial earth to earth space wave communication. True ground wave, which to me, is the same as the surface wave, actually can follow the curvature of the earth, which a space wave cannot do. But true ground or surface waves are generally only taken advantage of on the lower frequencies such as MW, or LW. But they can be used likely as high as say the 40m band in some cases. I used to have a fairly stout ground wave on 40m when I ran a high ground plane. And I think part of that energy was acting as a surface wave and following the curvature of the earth. The reason I think so, is because the distances I could work with it were a good bit farther than what I would expect with the space wave alone. And I could use the space and surface wave in that case, no matter what time of day or night, or regardless of the conditions needed for sky wave between the two locations. So lots of times during the day when the MUF dropped low enough to lose those people who were 100-150 miles away via sky wave, I was still able to work them via the ground wave. The people using the dipoles and such could hardly hear a peep out of the ones I was working in those cases. And BTW - don't worry about the trolls who have no idea what they are talking about - but insist on showing their ignorance, anyway. We sure wouldn't want to have any of that, now would we.. :/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Monopole Radiation Characteristics | Antenna | |||
Vertical radiation from horizontal dipole? | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
The Ka'ba in Mecca Emits Short-wave Radiation | Shortwave | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna |