Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/15 12:24, Roger Hayter wrote:
I suspect that the sort of precision with which one can measure signal strength. plus very local variations of surface wave intensity due to varying ground conditions, mean that it would be hard to know if the signal level resulted from, say, one, five or fifty percent of the transmitted power. So I suspect your question has never been answered. But somebody must have done the research, somewhere... An opportunity for some collaborative research between local amateurs? No-one wants to run verticals...too difficult.... A 160m vertical aerial feeding a webSDR, located somewhere near the centre of England, would, using surface (redacted) have a fair-to-considerable percentage coverage of the UK Amateur population and be very useful as a test-bed. Sadly, I don't live near Coventry, although I've been sent there once or twice. The usual webSDRs seem to run on horizontals, unsurprisingly, so not a lot of use for this sort of thing. -- Spike "Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad law". Judge Rolfe |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Monopole Radiation Characteristics | Antenna | |||
Vertical radiation from horizontal dipole? | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
The Ka'ba in Mecca Emits Short-wave Radiation | Shortwave | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna |