| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/9/2015 3:29 AM, Jeff wrote:
I've been lurking in this thread and it reminded me of a time many years ago when I was working on a receiver setup. A colleague gave me a book with an equation for signal strength of a signal in the cell phone frequency range in various terrestrial environments. I had a little trouble accepting an arbitrary equation that wasn't at least close to the typical 1/r^2 formula in free space. I seem to recall there was no 1/r^2 term at all rather it was more like a linear or maybe had a rlog(r) term. In any event, no one could explain where the equation came from. I suppose it was an empirical equation rather than something derived from theory. Ignoring waves bounced off the upper atmosphere, I assume the earth acts to help focus the signal and strengthen it close to the ground? You are correct, most of those formulas are empirical, base on actual observations. Look up papers by Egli and by Hatta, they will five you some idea on how theses formulas were derived. Jeff As are basically all formulas. Even Ohm's Law was derived from actual observations. Although Einstein's equations such as E=mc^2 wasn't derived from actual observation, it did come by projection of existing knowledge by an exceptional mind. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vertical Monopole Radiation Characteristics | Antenna | |||
| Vertical radiation from horizontal dipole? | Antenna | |||
| Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
| The Ka'ba in Mecca Emits Short-wave Radiation | Shortwave | |||
| Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||