|
A psychological conundrum?
Why would a recently licensed person who seems to lack any
technical acumen whatsoever and jumps on the bandwagon whenever he perceives that someone is on the receiving end of abuse spend his time being abusive to a long-established radio amateur who graduated in electronics long before that recently licensed person was even a twinkle in the milkman's eye? Does kudos accrue in the world of amateur radio today by protracted campaigns of abuse, especially when that abuse arises from being openly challenged technically? If such a recently licensed person were to exist in reality, would it be a condemnation of the dumbing down of the entrance qualifications needed to obtain a licence? |
A psychological conundrum?
On 09/03/15 19:33, gareth wrote:
Why would... ....any person in their right mind crosspost that nonsense to 2 amateur radio groups? |
A psychological conundrum?
Sonny ¡d wrote:
On 09/03/15 19:33, gareth wrote: Why would... ...any person in their right mind crosspost that nonsense to 2 amateur radio groups? I think you answered your own question... -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
A psychological conundrum?
On 09/03/15 19:33, gareth wrote:
Why would a recently licensed person who seems to lack any technical acumen whatsoever and jumps on the bandwagon whenever he perceives that someone is on the receiving end of abuse spend his time being abusive to a long-established radio amateur who graduated in electronics long before that recently licensed person was even a twinkle in the milkman's eye? Does kudos accrue in the world of amateur radio today by protracted campaigns of abuse, especially when that abuse arises from being openly challenged technically? If such a recently licensed person were to exist in reality, would it be a condemnation of the dumbing down of the entrance qualifications needed to obtain a licence? ====== There we go again ........... Frank GM0CSZ |
A psychological conundrum?
On 3/9/2015 5:18 PM, highlandham wrote:
On 09/03/15 19:33, gareth wrote: Why would a recently licensed person who seems to lack any technical acumen whatsoever and jumps on the bandwagon whenever he perceives that someone is on the receiving end of abuse spend his time being abusive to a long-established radio amateur who graduated in electronics long before that recently licensed person was even a twinkle in the milkman's eye? Does kudos accrue in the world of amateur radio today by protracted campaigns of abuse, especially when that abuse arises from being openly challenged technically? If such a recently licensed person were to exist in reality, would it be a condemnation of the dumbing down of the entrance qualifications needed to obtain a licence? ====== There we go again ........... Frank GM0CSZ Where's Chip when you need a good argument. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
A psychological conundrum?
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:38:55 +0000, Sonny ¡d wrote:
On 09/03/15 19:33, gareth wrote: Why would... ...any person in their right mind crosspost that nonsense to 2 amateur radio groups? People here should do as I did and filter his posts automatically deleting them every time I get new headers. Unfortunately people replying get through. Rather than argue with the moron, I suggest others filter his posts as well. That will put an end to his childish diatribes that have nothing to do with the group. Stop feeding trolls! |
Quote:
I get the impression that he likes to read his own posts! |
A psychological conundrum?
On 10/03/15 19:02, Flash wrote:
Stop feeding trolls! I only ever feed him emetics. |
A psychological conundrum?
"jta" wrote in message
... 'highlandham[_3_ Wrote: ;836609']On 09/03/15 19:33, gareth wrote:- Why would a recently licensed person who seems to lack any technical acumen whatsoever and jumps on the bandwagon whenever he perceives that someone is on the receiving end of abuse spend his time being abusive to a long-established radio amateur who graduated in electronics long before that recently licensed person was even a twinkle in the milkman's eye? Does kudos accrue in the world of amateur radio today by protracted campaigns of abuse, especially when that abuse arises from being openly challenged technically? If such a recently licensed person were to exist in reality, would it be a condemnation of the dumbing down of the entrance qualifications needed to obtain a licence? - ====== There we go again ........... Frank GM0CSZ And what does any of this drivel have to do with antennas? I get the impression that he likes to read his own posts! It is a criticism of an infantile poster to this NG, and it is noticeable that you raised no objections to the appalling posts of that poster, but only to an attempt to maintain standards of decency. |
Maybe if you posted your infantile crap in an appropriate newsgroup you'd get some sympathy?
I repeat: What has any of this to do with antennas? Try answering the question this time. |
A psychological conundrum?
"jta" wrote in message
... Maybe if you posted your infantile crap in an appropriate newsgroup you'd get some sympathy? By your immature outburst you become indistinguishable from the other abusive children. |
A psychological conundrum?
"jta" wrote in message
... I repeat: What has any of this to do with antennas? Try answering the question this time. If you feel that way, then why do you seek to prolong this thread? |
Quote:
|
A psychological conundrum?
jta wrote:
gareth;836687 Wrote: "jta" wrote in message ...- I repeat: What has any of this to do with antennas? Try answering the question this time.- If you feel that way, then why do you seek to prolong this thread? Typical SPAMmer; creates topics just to waste bandwidth and does everything possible to prolong them - without ever answering the most basic of questions. Sadly, Gareth Alun Evans G4SDW has something wrong with him. He's defective and you'll experience no joy from trying to reason with him. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
A psychological conundrum?
"jta" wrote in message
... I repeat: What has any of this to do with antennas? Try answering the question this time.- Typical SPAMmer; creates topics just to waste bandwidth and does everything possible to prolong them - without ever answering the most basic of questions. If you feel that way, then why do you yourself seek to prolong this thread? The spammer was he who originated the abuse in the first palce, and I query why you did not take him to task, rather than attacking those who protest at such childish behaviour? I have to say that you are presenting as exactly the sort of personality that you seek to condemn. What have your continuing diatribes and infantile outbursts to do with antennae? |
A psychological conundrum?
"gareth" wrote in message
... "jta" wrote in message ... I repeat: What has any of this to do with antennas? Try answering the question this time.- Typical SPAMmer; creates topics just to waste bandwidth and does everything possible to prolong them - without ever answering the most basic of questions. If you feel that way, then why do you yourself seek to prolong this thread? What have your continuing diatribes and infantile outbursts to do with antennae? jta? Hullo? Are you there? RST000 here OM VA KN |
A psychological conundrum?
"gareth" wrote in message
... Why would a recently licensed person who seems to lack any technical acumen whatsoever and jumps on the bandwagon whenever he perceives that someone is on the receiving end of abuse spend his time being abusive to a long-established radio amateur who graduated in electronics long before that recently licensed person was even a twinkle in the milkman's eye? Does kudos accrue in the world of amateur radio today by protracted campaigns of abuse, especially when that abuse arises from being openly challenged technically? If such a recently licensed person were to exist in reality, would it be a condemnation of the dumbing down of the entrance qualifications needed to obtain a licence? jta seems to be remarkably absent in condemning the outbursts of infantile ignorance that have plagued this NG today. Hypocrisy, or what? |
A psychological conundrum?
On 14/03/15 16:55, gareth wrote:
Hypocrisy, or what? Definitely what, what? |
A psychological conundrum?
"jta" wrote in message
... Yes, I'm still here, and I'm still laughing at you. I have decided not to contribute to your mental illness any further. Trying to have an intelligent conversation with you is like trying to teach a pig to sing: A total waste of time. But one final question: Have you managed to get more than one-half mile from a CB radio yet? Cheers. You continue to be indistinguishable from those whom you seek to proscribe. CAPTAIN MAINWARING Stupid boy! /CAPTAIN MAINWARING |
A psychological conundrum?
jta wrote:
gareth;836802 Wrote: "gareth" lid wrote in message ...- "jta" wrote in message ...-- I repeat: What has any of this to do with antennas? Try answering the question this time.-- Typical SPAMmer; creates topics just to waste bandwidth and does everything possible to prolong them - without ever answering the most basic of questions.- If you feel that way, then why do you yourself seek to prolong this thread? What have your continuing diatribes and infantile outbursts to do with antennae?- jta? Hullo? Are you there? RST000 here OM VA KN Yes, I'm still here, and I'm still laughing at you. I have decided not to contribute to your mental illness any further. Trying to have an intelligent conversation with you is like trying to teach a pig to sing: A total waste of time. But one final question: Have you managed to get more than one-half mile from a CB radio yet? I don't think he ever has, it was 1/4 mile that he managed, IIRC. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
A psychological conundrum?
"jta" wrote in message
... I have decided not to contribute to your mental illness any further. But one final question: Have you managed to get more than one-half mile from a CB radio yet? Not only are you introducing subject matter that contradicts your original whinge, but now, despite your claim to be washing your hands of me, you are showing evidence of stalking me. Perhaps it is not I who is exhibiting mental peculiarity? |
A psychological conundrum?
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:39:22 +0000, gareth wrote:
Perhaps it is not I who is exhibiting mental peculiarity? You exhibit almost every possible mental peculiarity. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com