LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 14th 04, 04:22 AM
Jerry Martes
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim - NN7K" wrote in message
.. .


Jerry, just because you are wanting to recieve, instead of transmit,
doesn't mean that the V.S.W.R. mismatch isn't there-- nor its effect
on the subsequent coax loss's being multiplied because of the mismatch!
Remember- the antenna , coax, and the mismatch are all bi-directional !
The additional loss in the feedline, because of a high swr, is also
present in the recieve direction! If you have copy of ARRL handbook, or
other sources, look under "transmission lines" - these have a chart of
coax loss, and also the swr effect on that coax loss.
For example, coax with 4 dB loss, at swr of 1.5 /1 would raise the line
loss by an extra .1 dB, while an swr of 3:1 would rais it by an extra
dB, at 5:1, would add about 2.2dB loss! and- keep in mind this is
BI-DIRECTIONAL loss ! Another consideration is that the noise figure is
optimized for 50 ohm, and this (because of a mismatch), will also be
negatively affected! Best to find good impedence match for all
considerations-- Jim NN7K


Jerry Martes wrote:

SNIP
In addition, I have assumed that the impedance mismatch for receiving
antennas can be allowed to be much greater than for transmitting. This
statement is directed to the fact that transmission line loss is

increased
by VSWR, and the reciever isnt restricted to being the same impedance of

the
transmission line.

Jerry



Jim

I sure wouldnt argue with your findings. I guess this identifies my
sloppy engineering. I didnt think 4 Db was a tolerable feed line loss
under any but the most dire circumstances. I wonder what a ~3:1 VSWR would
do to add attenuation to feed line loss os, say 1 1/2 db.
To further identify my sloppyness, I cant distinguish zero db from 0.1 db.
It is even difficult for me to determine with any confidance the difference
between Zero db and 1 db.
What I'm getting at is -- I still contend that a receiver can tolerate
some mismatches that arent tolerable in a sophisticated transmitting
station. Richard Fry has pointed out how critical small mismatches are in
FM transmitters. This original post referanced a FM transmitting antenna.
It would be reasonable (to me) to assume this referanced antenna could
have some rigid constraints if it was to be used for transmitting stereo FM.
But, as a omniazimuth FM receiver antenna, the phasing might be fairly
straightforward.

Jerry


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017