Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"Roy Lewallen" wrote Oops. I meant, WHEN RECEIVING, fiddling with the antenna or the antenna/feedline match won't have any effect at all on the line SWR. It will, of course, change the line SWR when transmitting. _____________ However that doesn't mean that it's unimportant to match the feedpoint impedance of a rx antenna to the feedline connected there. A rx antenna with a mismatched feedline will not deliver to the rx end of the feedline the maximum possible energy available from the fields in which that antenna is immersed. Whatever received power that is reflected by a mismatch at the rx antenna feedpoint is re-radiated (less losses). What both Roy and Richard say is correct in principle, but may be missing the point about what a receiver needs. What's usually important is to present the RX input with the *source* impedance it was designed for. (Most often this is 50 ohms, and let's also assume 50-ohm line for the rest of this discussion.) Likewise the transmitter needs to be presented with a 50-ohm load impedance, so those two requirements coincide. In order to achieve a 50-ohm load impedance for the transmitter, and a 50-ohm source impedance for the receiver, the antenna itself must be matched to 50 ohms - so that's your design aim. Now when Richard says: Whatever received power that is reflected by a mismatch at the rx antenna feedpoint is re-radiated (less losses), that is true in principle, but more important is that if any energy is reflected from the receiver input, that is perfectly OK - that energy was "not wanted" by the receiver. The receiver *does* want a 50-ohm source, but it only takes what it needs from that source. For example, a simple tuned-gate FET amplifier only needs a voltage swing at the input - it doesn't need current as well, so most of the incident power is reflected. That type of situation is very common in receiver design, and completely OK. It is a myth that a receiver input is not optimized unless it presents a 50-ohm load. What it does need is a 50-ohm source impedance. The design details about input reflection coefficient are much more complex, but the underlying principle is simply "The RX input takes whatever it needs from a 50-ohm source, and reflects the rest." RX inputs *can* be designed to present a 50-ohm load impedance, even with FETs, but this requires special design techniques that generally involve feedback. It is usually done when some other device has to be inserted between the feedline and the RX input, eg a filter which requires a 50-ohm load impedance. But that device probably requires a 50-ohm source impedance too, so you still have the same requirement for the antenna to be matched to the feedline. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |