Dead Serious T2FD: HV Insulation, EMP Arrestors, extra Coax Choke?
As the T2FD is growing in popularity,
I hope these issues will be of interest to more than just a few. SITUATION I. I am building a T2FD, for receiving and *maximum* 10W RF out. II. I have a decent RF and DC ground near the antenna site on top of the building (huge masses of steel), but not in my shack, which is some 120 ft. below. This is not unlike having the antenna out on the lot, and the shack somewhere up in the attic. III. I want to get rid of any static charges and also to reduce the risk of EMP travelling down the coax. This too must be a concern for quite a few people... IV. Also, I'd like to avoid as much as possible any hums that may derive from poor double grounding. After all, we mostly do HAVE to ground stuff inside the shack as well, for electrical safety. PLAN 1) Make the balun with full DC-insulation between high-Z and low-Z windings on the toroid-core balun. If everything is nice and symmetric, only transversal-mode RF will flow. 2) Ground the middle of the high-Z winding to the locally available ground. NOT ground the low-Z winding - I'll just connect it to the coax. Route internal wires for maximum insulation. Fill the balun case with either epoxy or urethane foam. Keep the two leads (coax, ground) well separated. 3) Insert EMP dischargers right into the balun: - One across the high-Z winding, for transversal mode. - One between each high-Z lead and ground, for common mode. - One across the low-Z winding, a'shunt the coax, for transversal-mode. And also one across the top resistor, also for transversal. 4) Put one or more large iron-core chokes on the coax, as to dampen EMP that could possibly travel on the outside of the coax shield. (This would also ensure that RF power or noise will not travel on the outside of the shield, of course) LIFE IS FULL OF QUESTIONS Here are just some of mine. a) For HV DC insulation in the balun, I intend to use as large a PVC-insulated conductor as I can fit, wind the high-Z winding, wrap it in insulating tape, and wind the low-Z winding on the top of the insulating layer. - PVC is said to be lossy. Is it a dramatic loss or not? - What tape should I use? - Is the insulated core of a coax a decent alternative to HV wire? - What is the implication of making a low-Z winding ATOP the high-Z one & the insulating layer, instead of interleaving them? b) For receiving, small 90V neon bulbs should already provide some protection. But 10W RF on 75 ohm already means some 27+ Vrms, wich would rise to over 50Vrms across a balanced 300 ohm load - if the mismatch is modest, that is. - Are low voltage neons already sufficiently horourable dischargers, or should I consider some other kind of (comparatively more honourable) dischargers? c) For the coax shield choke, I am considering 20 tight turns on a 5in. plastic pipe, the steel core being made with pieces of thin, insulated rebar - enough to fill the pipe. The core should increase the inductance considerably. Weight not an issue: the choke will be hung somewhere safe on the roof, probably 40 ft. away from the balun. - Any reason to vote for either major party candidate in the coming election? - Any reason to use FLAT steel instead of cheap, easy to find rebars? d) Other than the difference in weight, what are the pros and cons of potting a balun in liquid-poured epoxy resin vs. filling the balun case with urethane foam injected from a can? Any contributed wisdom will be appreciated! N1JPR/I2 |
|
Thank you Richard! I'll try to explain.
II. I have a decent RF and DC ground near the antenna site on top of the building (huge masses of steel), but not in my shack, which is some 120 ft. below. This is not unlike having the antenna out on the lot, and the shack somewhere up in the attic. Yes, after a fashion. What you mean to say is you are still far from earth ground, but have plenty of metal. Yes, it sounds weird, because it is. I have to thank another ham, I2FZX, for the almost ideal situation. On the TOP of my building there's a 50 ft steel lattice tower (HF/VHF/UHF beams) and a tornado-proof 20 ft dish (1/2 kW UHF moonbounce). They are some 80ft apart, both grounded. Right now, I still have no real grounding in my flat - I just have a virtual ground connecting all the conductive material in the shack, which does help reduce noise and hazards. I intend to at least bring the wiring up to regulation. That won't help with lightning safety, though. I intend to string the T2FD between the fixed part of the tower (~40ft) and the base of the dish. I could use either for grounding, but I'd opt for grounding at the dish, which is right atop my place. EMP Certainly are for those who aren't signatories of the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. This is a bad neighborhood. Nuke blasts are an almost daily occurence. As they are not meant for testing purposes, I am afraid the NTB treaty does not apply. Also, there's a known focus of Al Qaeda activity just a mile away (go to www.tuttocitta.it and plonk in Milano / Viale Jenner 50) but it can't be closed because it would hurt certain people's sensitivities. I wear lead pants all the time. IV. Also, I'd like to avoid as much as possible any hums that may derive from poor double grounding. After all, we mostly do HAVE to ground stuff inside the shack as well, for electrical safety. Anticipating what follows, perhaps you should simply loop couple all of that steel at the top of the building. No ground issue there. No direct connections. No HV problems. Please elaborate. Do you mean turning the warship atop my bldg into a ground reference loop? 2) Ground the middle of the high-Z winding to the locally available ground. NOT ground the low-Z winding - I'll just connect it to the coax. Here is where the part about doing it right raises its ugly head. Ground is not simply a matter of being bulk metal. At least not RF ground, and not always safety ground. Well, not exactly. A large bulk of metal is usually a pretty good capacitive sink at HF. In fact, even an insulated structure works decently as a RF ground. I even built crystal radios in which very few square inches of sheet metal were enough to provide a cap sink that had a large effect when worked against a wire antenna. As for safety ground, NEVER "assume" that a bulk of metal is grounded. If you did, you could easily be found guilty of manslaughter in court. In some jurisdictions you have to get an an electrician to sign you off that, among other things, a piece of eqpt is properly grounded. In professional radio installations, one sees a "ground reference" system which is indeed DC-grounded, but for RF purposes, most of the sink effect comes from strapping together everything in sight, including cabinets, metal furniture, building structures, drains, floor support etc etc. Route internal wires for maximum insulation. Fill the balun case with either epoxy or urethane foam. Keep the two leads (coax, ground) well separated. This is more a matter of cosmetics and personal preference than engineering consideration. I would like to maximize the chance that any burst of energy will take the ground path rather than the coax path. Why should putting, say, 3kV insulation between the antenna and the coax not matter? Incidentally, you do find kV-range insulation in commercial products as well. Lead dressing is adequate and mounting does the rest. What do you mean? 3) Insert EMP dischargers right into the balun: - One across the high-Z winding, for transversal mode. - One between each high-Z lead and ground, for common mode. - One across the low-Z winding, a'shunt the coax, for transversal-mode. And also one across the top resistor, also for transversal. The resistor is already going to snub any "EMP" the rest is window dressing. It takes quite a few KV to jump an inch. So it snubs any EMP but not an RF signal. What is the spectrum of an EMP? Is it more like DC or more like all across the RF spectrum? 4) Put one or more large iron-core chokes on the coax, as to dampen EMP that could possibly travel on the outside of the coax shield. (This would also ensure that RF power or noise will not travel on the outside of the shield, of course) 8 turns of 6 inch diameter loops will do just as well, as would a simple 1:1 Current BalUn. You are too much concerned with Nuclear Blast. If you suffer EMP, you've got far more to worry about. Now I understand. FYI, what gets you in a lightning near-hit _is_ an EMP. I once had an audible arc in an antenna due to a 1-lightning thunderstorm. That single hit happened in the midst of a city, and took out several power stations and countless other equipment. My antenna was 8 miles away. a) For HV DC insulation in the balun, I intend to use as large a PVC-insulated conductor as I can fit, wind the high-Z winding, wrap it in insulating tape, and wind the low-Z winding on the top of the insulating layer. - PVC is said to be lossy. Is it a dramatic loss or not? - What tape should I use? - Is the insulated core of a coax a decent alternative to HV wire? - What is the implication of making a low-Z winding ATOP the high-Z one & the insulating layer, instead of interleaving them? 10W is not going to generate any potentials to offer such prospects of arc or corona - unless you are constructing a very small loop or dipole. You have already described you are using a T2FD which obviates that headache. Great! But what about losses? I NEVER saw baluns with windings atop each other - they were always directly wound on the core. And I don't know why. b) For receiving, small 90V neon bulbs should already provide some protection. And maximum noise generation if they should ever fire. How's that going to happen? Is this massive metal structure at the top of your building an AM transmitter tower with a 50KW signal? Nothing but EMP. Lightning arrestors, if not MOV, are mostly gas discharge devices. All of yesteryear's professional toob radios and many consumer ones included a tiny neon lamp in their front end. c) For the coax shield choke, I am considering 20 tight turns on a 5in. plastic pipe, the steel core being made with pieces of thin, insulated rebar - enough to fill the pipe. Excessive² OK! - Any reason to vote for either major party candidate in the coming election? Vote Status Quo and wait for the night of the Long Knives. OK! Will do. - Any reason to use FLAT steel instead of cheap, easy to find rebars? Lead may help with the issues of thermonuclear events. Great! But lead will lead to lead poisoning litigation too. I don't want to litigate a lead-poisoned nuclear-armed jihadi. Lead poisoning is also rumored to lead people to insanity - see Goya (the painter, not the beans). So, I don't want to litigate a lead-poisoned nuclear-armed totally-out-of-his-mind jihadi either. In fact, you would probably get just as good a signal out if you simply ran 20 feet of coax to a 100 foot wire going up and tying off (or not) to all this metal. I had thought about that too, esp. for LF! Problem is, between moi and the warship up on top lie crouching and waiting a few tens of TV sets and just as many PCs. I already have a wire going up to the 5th floor (out of 9). Works great, but only after 1 am, and only because energy-conscious Italians always switch off their gear at night. 73 N1JPR/I2 |
|
What part of "electromagnetic pulse" refers to nuclear blast?
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... .. You are too much concerned with Nuclear Blast. If you suffer EMP, you've got far more to worry about. |
"CW" no adddress@spam free.com wrote in message ... What part of "electromagnetic pulse" refers to nuclear blast? For many that is what is thought of. Just as when someone mentions dropping THE bomb. It is thought of as nuclear. An air burst is suspose to cause the EMP that will fry most electronics. |
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:29:56 GMT, "Ralph Mowery"
wrote: "CW" no adddress@spam free.com wrote in message ... What part of "electromagnetic pulse" refers to nuclear blast? For many that is what is thought of. Just as when someone mentions dropping THE bomb. It is thought of as nuclear. An air burst is suspose to cause the EMP that will fry most electronics. For All, reference "The Electromagnetic Bomb (E-Bomb)": http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...pp/apjemp.html "The ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP) effect [1] was first observed during the early testing of high altitude airburst nuclear weapons [GLASSTONE64]. The effect is characterised by the production of a very short (hundreds of nanoseconds) but intense electromagnetic pulse, which propagates away from its source with ever diminishing intensity, governed by the theory of electromagnetism. ... "Even if the pulse is not powerful enough to produce thermal damage, the power supply in the equipment will readily supply enough energy to complete the destructive process. Wounded devices may still function, but their reliability will be seriously impaired. Shielding electronics by equipment chassis provides only limited protection, as any cables running in and out of the equipment will behave very much like antennae, in effect guiding the high voltage transients into the equipment." Note, the EMP of the Flux Compression Generator, an example of a tactical E-Bomb, is VASTLY richer in current unlike a lightning strike: "The FCG is a device capable of producing electrical energies of tens of MegaJoules in tens to hundreds of microseconds of time, in a relatively compact package. With peak power levels of the order of TeraWatts to tens of TeraWatts, FCGs may be used directly, or as one shot pulse power supplies for microwave tubes. To place this in perspective, the current produced by a large FCG is between ten to a thousand times greater than that produced by a typical lightning stroke [WHITE78]." However, these intense currents are not widely suitable for mission purposes for the same reasons of the Lightning's current pulse: "Whilst FCGs are potent technology base for the generation of large electrical power pulses, the output of the FCG is by its basic physics constrained to the frequency band below 1 MHz. Many target sets will be difficult to attack even with very high power levels at such frequencies..." Details abound in this paper, which I will leave to the student to absorb. Of particular note are the statements about coupling efficiency (unpredictable) and range (hundreds of meters). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Richard,
Thank you for the exhaustive reply! [...] this works for RF but for lightning that is another matter (and at different frequencies simultaneously). LOL! Your need for ground when you are using a dipole is unwarranted in terms of RF. Yes and no. A "stand alone" antenna such as a dipole is not worked against a RF ground. (BTW, I remember seeing Hertz's original dipole in a museum in Wuerzburg... & I swear it wasn't grounded). But a ground is a good pulse sink if it is very permeable across the spectrum. In that sense, a pulse sink should be a decent RF ground too. Make sure the ends stand off from the supports by a good amount - I can only guess, and that would be 10 feet. Absolutely! Insofar as safety ground goes, it is hard to believe that is not supplied in your apartment - somewhere. Further, with regard to lightning, you are probably already living inside a faraday shield (the building's steel, skeletal structure), but make sure you ground the coax coming into the apartment at the window or where it penetrates a wall. To answer my earlier question, connect the coax shield to the building frame before it begins its descent to your apartment. I wish... In this part of the world steel structures are unheard of 'cept in industrial buildings. The tallest building in the country is only 30 floors, and its structure is reinforced concrete. Also, walls are always some form of brick & mortar ot at least gypsum. This explain why fire safety & property insurance are almost an afterthought here. We do have disasters, but very few in post 1930's high rises - mostly it's cheap built 19th century buildings collapsing after a gas explosion. Otherwise, one flat may burn out but others won't be damaged. Also, a power grounding is very effective for low frequency events. If you get zapped by a pulse, all bets are off if your ground is high impedance - and an end-fed thin ground wire is. In my case, the shortest route to the building ground connection on my floor is almost 100 ft with lots of zigzagging. Think of a Gamma or Delta match. Although these connect to the metal of the structure they drive, they are inductive loops. You could as easily build the loop and place it in close proximity to the structure to accomplish the same thing. This gives you isolation except for the frequency the loop is tuned to (and would limit you to a narrow band of operation unless you have some means to remotely tune it). I had never thought of that. So a broadband / omni antenna puts a bit more punch into the coax than a narrowband / mispointed beam. But I'd still rather put up a simple, forgiving, uncritical broadband, even if known inferior. Keeping leads apart and away from conductive structures replaces all the exotic insulation you could imagine. Besides, if we are talking about your T2FD and coax, I cannot imagine this is a problem in the first place. You are going to want to drive the coax shield to ground as soon as possible, not isolate it with insulation. You are going to want to isolate the T2FD ends, but any induced potentials will have to reckon with the built in resistor snubbing them. Such potential does not merit heroic insulation efforts. OK, I'm abandoning the heroic insulation efforts. I'll ground the coax up on top, and introduce an insulating transformer to decouple grounds only if double grounding introduces noise - that can be done later at the shack end of the coax. What is the spectrum of an EMP? It is mostly Pulsed DC with very little RF over 1MHz. The pulse shape is characteristically described as several µS rise and about 20 µS fall. If you consider the strike contains 100,000A and integrate this pulse over one second, then the duty cycle reduces this to 10 - 100 A. Now I know what to expect when I wile away a thunderstorm sucking an antenna plug. I NEVER saw baluns with windings atop each other To maintain a wide bandwidth and to preserve balance. Got it! I have repaired many such sets, professional and consumer alike. Yes, some included the NE-2. That practice was discarded just as many years ago too. There are probably a billion TVs out there, and not one of them with this kind of protection. Things change. Just as many more people now enjoy the other side, most TVs get their storm thrills through the power socket nowadays - especially if served by cable :0. Open a PSU, and you'll likely find MOV's. Not good for RF work because they tend to have too much capacitance.... And TV antennas tent to be 1) tiny 2) narrow beam, 3) tuned to UHF. No protection againt a direct hit, but non that sensitive to near hits. The market for gas discharge devices for many kinds of RF applications is still quite lively though, and it's not for protection against nearby transmitters. mine the archives of rec.radio.amateur.antenna for Richard Harrison, KB5WZI I'm grabbing my steel hat as I type! 73, thanks again. Filippo N1JPR/I2 |
|
Can you honestly say that an electromagnetic pulse cannot be generated by
anything but an atomic explosion? "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:29:56 GMT, "Ralph Mowery" wrote: "CW" no adddress@spam free.com wrote in message ... What part of "electromagnetic pulse" refers to nuclear blast? For many that is what is thought of. Just as when someone mentions dropping THE bomb. It is thought of as nuclear. An air burst is suspose to cause the EMP that will fry most electronics. For All, reference "The Electromagnetic Bomb (E-Bomb)": http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...pp/apjemp.html "The ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP) effect [1] was first observed during the early testing of high altitude airburst nuclear weapons [GLASSTONE64]. The effect is characterised by the production of a very short (hundreds of nanoseconds) but intense electromagnetic pulse, which propagates away from its source with ever diminishing intensity, governed by the theory of electromagnetism. ... "Even if the pulse is not powerful enough to produce thermal damage, the power supply in the equipment will readily supply enough energy to complete the destructive process. Wounded devices may still function, but their reliability will be seriously impaired. Shielding electronics by equipment chassis provides only limited protection, as any cables running in and out of the equipment will behave very much like antennae, in effect guiding the high voltage transients into the equipment." Note, the EMP of the Flux Compression Generator, an example of a tactical E-Bomb, is VASTLY richer in current unlike a lightning strike: "The FCG is a device capable of producing electrical energies of tens of MegaJoules in tens to hundreds of microseconds of time, in a relatively compact package. With peak power levels of the order of TeraWatts to tens of TeraWatts, FCGs may be used directly, or as one shot pulse power supplies for microwave tubes. To place this in perspective, the current produced by a large FCG is between ten to a thousand times greater than that produced by a typical lightning stroke [WHITE78]." However, these intense currents are not widely suitable for mission purposes for the same reasons of the Lightning's current pulse: "Whilst FCGs are potent technology base for the generation of large electrical power pulses, the output of the FCG is by its basic physics constrained to the frequency band below 1 MHz. Many target sets will be difficult to attack even with very high power levels at such frequencies..." Details abound in this paper, which I will leave to the student to absorb. Of particular note are the statements about coupling efficiency (unpredictable) and range (hundreds of meters). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
"CW" no adddress@spam free.com schreef in bericht ... Can you honestly say that an electromagnetic pulse cannot be generated by anything but an atomic explosion? Lightning? gr, hwh |
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 11:53:19 -0700, "CW" no adddress@spam free.com
wrote: Can you honestly say that an electromagnetic pulse cannot be generated by anything but an atomic explosion? Hi OM, I can honestly say that an EMP can be generated by walking across a wool carpet and touching a faucet handle. I could describe striking a match as a conflagration or dropping a glass as a shattering experience. The term EMP is derived from a truly BIG event with truly BIG consequences. Trying to elevate smaller examples and saying the outcome is equal, is not honest at all. The nuclear EMP is orders of magnitude higher in frequency and currents BOTH compared to lightning. Saying that the EMP of lightning will cause the same disabilities has been thoroughly discounted by sheer lack of evidence. We've had both electronic gear and lightning for a long time, and no one noticed EMP until they dropped The Bomb. Now, EMP is like sighting Elvis. I have vaporized a screwdriver with far, far less current than lightning has found its way unscathed through smaller radius wire. The recitation of astounding numbers does not make an argument. Even the Air Force's E-Bombs show they can eclipse lighting's current, to no greater destruction (which was not particularly effective in the first place). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
CW wrote:
Can you honestly say that an electromagnetic pulse cannot be generated by anything but an atomic explosion? An electromagnetic pulse can be generated by a time domain reflectometer. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
SpamHog wrote:
I. I am building a T2FD, for receiving and *maximum* 10W RF out. 10W out of the antenna or 10W out of the transmitter? With a T2FD, there is a very large difference on certain frequencies. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
hwh wrote: "CW" no adddress@spam free.com schreef in bericht ... Can you honestly say that an electromagnetic pulse cannot be generated by anything but an atomic explosion? Lightning? gr, hwh Google "EMP Test" Dave |
Cecil,
10W out of the antenna or 10W out of the transmitter? With a T2FD, there is a very large difference on certain frequencies. Out of the TX. I know that the lower you go, the warmer the pigeon sitting on the resistor will get. I tested the small neons I have. I basically found two types, one that clips at 60V, the other at 110V. I made a classic 4:1 balun and soldered one 60V between each balanced arm and common. I know it's like wearing suspenders and belt, but I don't think they will hurt at under 10W. Also, in view of what I read, I understand Richard's claim that a T2FD will snuff out much of the energy anyway: - if the spectrum of the AC induced by a near hit is mostly in the LF to MF range, the resistor will indeed take most of the heat, just as if the power were coming from the coax - moreover, as I sized the windings for 4MHz and up, the balun itself will short to ground much of the leftover energy it does receive from a near hit. |
Why, the terms "electromagnetic" and "pulse" should be common knowledge to
anyone that has any interest in this group. "Dave Holford" wrote in message Google "EMP Test" Dave |
Richard Clark wrote in message news:
Returning to the issue of lightning, I would suggest you mine the archives of rec.radio.amateur.antenna for Richard Harrison, KB5WZI More silly musings: I read, among other things, that the advice to introduce a coax shield RF choke as lightning protection has been dropped, mostly on the grounds that a choke is an EMP pickup. Hmmmm... That applies to a helical wound inductor, not an isotropically near-deaf winding like a toroid. In turn, a single-layer toroid winding would offer a flashover point between the hot and cold ends of the winding. OTOH if the inductor is made - with a couple of windings on straight drainpipe - electrically in series - axes parallel - oppositely oriented - spaced enough to reduce mutual inductance (say, one yard or more), what you get is high insulation, no flashover point, limited pulse pickup (as long as the distance between the windings is that the distance between them and the putative pulse source). Another trick would be to make it a single shielded winding. (Insert warning about inductively shorted winding here -- ) Yet another would be the SPL, the satanist pentagonal layout. It's like a toroid, cept the winding is split in 5 parts, each in the middle of the 3-foot side of a pentagon. The two ends are kept well apart, of course. A weatherproof chandelier is to be lit in the middle as storms approach. Sounds like fun. If I find the inspiration I'll put in a phase canceling split-winding choke. |
|
Climb to the top of the building (you HAVE done this, haven't you?)
The top of my condo became very popular after I taught local kids how to pick the locks many years ago, a long time befor I got my own keys. Problem was, they would not limit themselves to our own condo roof. Now the place looks like a WW1 front line, as other condos erected barbed wire everywhere to keep them out. Luckily they can't be seen from the street level... and LOOK at those antennas and feed lines already there. Do they have this protection you fantasize about? Do they treat anything as ground? Do their lines tie to it? The other ham has a mess of some 20 or so lines, including meteosat x 2, sat-tv x 3, HF wire, HF beam, HF vertical, 2m GP, 2m collinear, 2m yagi, 70cm 2 elements x 16 array, 23 cm dish, VHF discone, weather station, 70 cm moonbounce, plus controls for rotor and azimut mount for the dish. All bonded in several places, and to the lattice tower as well. Plus the guy has a ground from shack on down. My obvious wish is that any rogue moving charge will prefer his invitation to mine. molten [...] unobtainium AFAIK, properly grounded gear rarely melts, although you tend to get some burn marks where the plasma kissed the metal. I have climbed as far as about 5 feet above the rotor, i.e. some 30+ feet from the roof and about 140 ft above street level. Any higher would be unwise without a harness (I do not intend to emulate Col. Armstrong, esp. with no chick looking on, although I did drag a few up to the roof). No burn marks up to that height. The unobtainum ingots that lie neatly stacked on the roof look pristine. is there any evidence of a fine metal particulate mist deposited along side the building (it will look glittery like Disco Makeup for a drag queen)? We do get a lot of that, but it must come from other local sources. Probably drag queens. Ask yourself, what makes your antenna so much more attractive when the Eiffel Tower looms over it. Intrinsic beauty? hearses in the parking lot Right, thinking of my numerous pacemaker-equipped neighbors you must be right. They do not fall like flies in an electrical storm. People killed by lighting in this area tend to be caught by exploding trees in parks. In the last serious case (2 dead, I think + several hurt, about a years ago) one lady's arm was was temporarily paralyzed by the EMP she caught from an umbrella she was holding about 50 ft from the tree that got hit. Those closer to the hit were hurt mechanically, not electrically. It was really bad luck. It had just started raining, and it was the very first bolt, while they were all leaving the park for a nearby cafe' - they were not braving the storm right under the trees. building those pentangle chokes may if fact incur a vengeful bolt delivered directly to you. Plus, any "pentagon" could also get the local jihadis all worked up. Hmmm, should I get some local priest / imam to come over and bless the hell out of it? A friend of mine did that to all his motorbikes, and they did work more reliably than mine. Now that I think of it, some local catholic priest indeed comes over for a round of apartment-by-apartment blessing once a year, and I always opted out. There must some neighborhood aura of blessedness that got layered on year after year. Who knows, in this modern age that religious metaphor may be embellished to a nuclear cruise missile to fulfill the prophecy of EMP. (Ah! Images of Monty Python's Holy Hand Grenade come to mind.) Pass the Lord and praise the Ammunition! Let us know how it turns out. ;-) It may take a while, esp. as I have to reuse (steal) someone else's abandoned & forgotten flue line to bring the coax to my place. A former underground garage & repair shop was turned into an unheated undergroud parking facility. They just ripped out the furnace (which for many years had provided me with an excellent local ground, btw!, although they never noticed). Now I have to drill a hole in a little known structure to access the chimney up on top. A straight 110ft drop! I hope I won't hit asbestos, which is a definite possibility. When the wire is up, I'll post some pix, I promise! 73 & thanks N1JPR/I2 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com