| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/11/2015 10:49 AM, Jeff wrote:
Why don't we use the RLR in all these measurements instead of SWR? Isn't that what we are really after? A very good question. One possible answer is that RL is normally quoted in dB, and VSWR linear scales are perhaps easier to envisage. eg 3:1 ~6dB RL 2:1 ~9.5dB RL 1.5:1 ~14dB RL 1.1:1 ~26dB RL Personally I find log scales more intuitive for most things as they more closely relates to factors of significance, no? But I see right away that RL scales the non-intuitive way, a larger number is a less significant value. While SWR scales the right way with 1 being no effect. SWR can also be given in dB which would make the numbers very intuitive. -- Rick |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
| Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave | |||