Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Jeff writes
Why don't we use the RLR in all these measurements instead of SWR? Tradition! Isn't that what we are really after? As long as you know what you're after, and get close to it, it doesn't really matter. A very good question. One possible answer is that RL is normally quoted in dB, and VSWR linear scales are perhaps easier to envisage. eg 3:1 ~6dB RL 2:1 ~9.5dB RL 1.5:1 ~14dB RL 1.1:1 ~26dB RL Isn't there somehow something sort-of unnatural about trying to aim for an infinite value? -- Ian |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave |