Egad. Please go back and read my postings. All I've said is that you
can't violate the law of conservation of energy. You shouldn't believe
this fundamental principle because Roy says you should -- you should
believe it because you've got a grasp of high school level physics, and
if you don't have a grasp of high school level physics, perhaps you
should get one before getting too carried away with theories about the
nature of radiation.

Of course, ignorance is bliss. If you disbelieve or simply choose to
ignore conservation of energy, you're then able to make perpetual motion
machines and other wonders, including any number of miracle antennas.

And Art, quit whining that "Roy feels an answer from him is
all that is required as in the word of God". What's required is that you
take the effort to learn a little fundamental physics. I'm sure you can
find an adequate explanation of the law of conservation of energy on the
web if you have an aversion to books -- written by someone other than
Roy. I'm not going to spoon-feed it to a reluctant learner.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

wrote:
. . . Roys says I am in error and
should accept it because he said so. He is knoweledgable but just his
word
is not good enough. . .

Hal Rosser wrote:
. . . You say Roy's word is not good enough - But Roy has
demonstrated his expertise in this area time and time again. . .

wrote:
. . .But sometimes Roy's words of wisdom does not satisfy the
questioner
asks for the underpinnings of the statement. Roy feels an answer from him is
all that is required
as in the word of God and he is not interested in trivialities and may even
leave the group for a while . . .