The RF Photonists in these NG are long on personal abuse but
short on knowledge and explanation; the sure signs of blathering ignorance?

Now, whereas it cannot be disputed that quantised objects such as atoms
and sub-atominc particles emit quantised radiation, and all the experimental
evidence and theories are very much based upon the observance of such
atomic and sub-atomic objects and not upon large scale objects such
as antennae, the energy that gets radiated from antennae
does not come from intra-atomic activity, but the compression of electrons
in a current
, compressing against their natural mutual repulsion.

What is the shape of the supposed RF photon?

How many cycles make up the RF photon?

Wy cannot the strident infantile abusers of the RF photonists answer such
questions?

Consider a single spike of static which generates wide-band noise over a
large spectrum.
As any photon is only at a single frequency, how many of the supposed RF
photons
(each with a fixed defined energy of hv) have been created by that spike?

An infinite number? If so the RF photonists among you must therefore hold
that any
spike of static, whether from a lightning strike, or an unsuppressed spark
plug must contain
infinite energy.

This alone shows that RF radiation, when nor created by atomic processes, is
continuous and
not quantised.