In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
"John S" wrote in message
...
On 9/10/2015 4:43 AM, gareth wrote:
Read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

You read it, and then come back and contribute to the debate.

There is nothing to debate; the science was firmly established long ago.

Debating the existance of the photon makes as much sense as debating
whether the Earth is round or flat.



--
Jim Pennino

On 9/10/2015 2:57 PM, wrote:
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
"John S" wrote in message
...
On 9/10/2015 4:43 AM, gareth wrote:
Read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

You read it, and then come back and contribute to the debate.

There is nothing to debate; the science was firmly established long ago.

Debating the existance of the photon makes as much sense as debating
whether the Earth is round or flat.

Don't keep us in suspence...

--

Rick

In rec.radio.amateur.antenna rickman wrote:
On 9/10/2015 2:57 PM, wrote:
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
"John S" wrote in message
...
On 9/10/2015 4:43 AM, gareth wrote:
Read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

You read it, and then come back and contribute to the debate.

There is nothing to debate; the science was firmly established long ago.

Debating the existance of the photon makes as much sense as debating
whether the Earth is round or flat.

Don't keep us in suspence...

For those out of touch for the last half millennia when the debate
ended, round.

The debate seems to have started with Herodotus in the 5th Century BC.

There are always some late to the party...


--
Jim Pennino