LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 19th 04, 02:42 AM
bob
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tuner/balun efficiency

Which should be more efficient: Using an ATR-30 to match a 300 ohm load
directly through a W2DU type balun, or using the same tuner to match 150
ohms using a CWS Bytemark 2:1 balun? Bandwidth is not a concern.I already
have the tuner and baluns. I realize there may be little difference between
the two choices, but I will be using the tuner and one of the baluns
anyway.

73,
bob
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Efficiency of radial system Richard Clark Antenna 1 August 17th 04 07:31 AM
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency Reg Edwards Antenna 23 January 10th 04 11:56 AM
160 metre efficiency Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 8 December 5th 03 05:37 PM
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas Ron Antenna 5 July 23rd 03 03:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017