Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob-- Effecient?? That term can apply to the LOSS in your feed line/
VSWR?Frequency! and, obviously, the POWER HANDLEING capabilities of the tuner/feedline! But, generally, unless you are at VHF, with couple hundred feet of feedline (I.E. 10 meters, or below)! any effeciency difference will never be HEARD!! the loss diff will probably be less than 1 dB! My advice? go for it, as long as it is in your tuners power rateing, for hi Z mismatch! Jim NN7K Bob sent: "bob" wrote in message ... Which should be more efficient: Using an ATR-30 to match a 300 ohm load directly through a W2DU type balun, or using the same tuner to match 150 ohms using a CWS Bytemark 2:1 balun? Bandwidth is not a concern.I already have the tuner and baluns. I realize there may be little difference between the two choices, but I will be using the tuner and one of the baluns anyway. 73, bob |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Efficiency of radial system | Antenna | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
160 metre efficiency | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |