Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 03:02:44 -0500, rickman wrote:
I'm not certain what you are saying. Short summary: 1. DC resistance does not change with soldering. 2. Temp and mechanical stability of the loop is greatly improved by soldering and welding. The stronger the joint, the more stable. 3. Soldering did not seem to affect the Q of the loop, although my method was rather sloppy and results uncertain. The part you quote sounds like he measured the DC resistance of the loop which has little to do with the AC resistance at RF. Correct. We're dealing with skin effect in a transmit loop. I guess this begs the question of why are magnetic loop builders NOT silver plating their loops? If skin effect is so important, then why are many home made loops using unplated and often unprotected copper? Electroless silver is easy to do and fairly inexpensive. I vaguely recall that it's difficult to plate electroless silver thicker than the RF skin depth on the lower bands, but I don't recall. In particular the solder joints end up being literally undetectable with DC because there is a large parallel surface between the 45° unions I assume he used and the pipe. Solder in this space joins the two copper parts with a much larger cross section reducing the resistance of a path through a more limited area of contact. Hardly. Even if there was an air gap between the overlapping copper sections, there would be enough capacitance in between for the antenna to operate normally. Of course, the tuning would change, and it might arc over, but it would still have roughly the same Q. But with RF currents the path will only be on the outside surface of the conductor. So without the solder the connection will be through a limited amount of area but the same is true for the solder joint since only the outer few mils of the pipe are used depending on the frequency involved. If the overlapping copper connections is really deemed a labyrinth, which increases the effective length of the loop, it would produce a rather drastic change in tuning. I've noticed a tuning change as the loop is moved before soldering but not much. The lengths involved are quite short when compared to the overall length of the loop. The skin effect of different materials seems to be current issue: http://owenduffy.net/calc/SkinDepth.htm Looks like the higher resistivity of 63/37 solder, compared to copper, required more skin depth. Adding some silver to the solder should fix that. In any case, the tiny amount of solder area, compared to the area of the loop, isn't going to dramatically increase the loop resistance. Let's try by example. I take two copper overlapping fittings and grind off some copper so that when stuck together, they have an air gap in between. I then fill the gap with solder. The added DC resistance will be the bulk resistivity of the solder times the surface area, which is small, but potentially significant when we're dealing with milliohms. However, the RF path only has to bridge the solder filled gap between the copper pipes. The increased RF path is just the difference in areas between the inner tube OD, and the outer tube ID. In other words, not much added RF path length from soldering. However, I literally can't imagine why the joints would not be soldered. Perhaps an analogy might help. If you assemble the parts of a ladder but don't tighten any of the bolts holding it together, it would still function as a ladder, but just wouldn't be particularly stable. Same with the loop antenna. It's customary to assemble the sections together, to see if they fit together, before soldering. It's also a good idea to test the tuning of the antenna, which might require some mechanical adjustments before soldering. The issue I was addressing is the difference between a solid tube and soldered joints. My explanation, admittedly a guess(tm), is that there's little difference in DC and RF resistance, but a substantial difference in mechanical and electrical stability. As to the strength issue and temperature effects, the entire loop would expand evenly and so no real stress would be on the solder other than the differential expansion of the two metals. I ran my IR thermometer around a copper loop to see if there was any unexpected heating. It was tricky, because the RF drove my IR thermometer nuts. So, I had to xmit 10 mins, turn off the transmitter, and then quickly take measurements. Hot spots were difficult to see because the thermally conductive copper would distribute the heat very quickly. Still, I managed to see tiny increases in temperature around some soldered joints, and a rather large jump where I had dissimilar metals (stainless hose clamps in the T-match). I think the hot spots in the joints were caused by the lower thermal conductivity of the solder compared to copper. In a loop I was thinking of using tin-lead solder for the overlap area of the joints and then finishing off the visible portion of the joint with silver solder. I wasn't aware silver solder is stronger than other solder. If so, I might just use it for the entire soldering process. I forgot to include a link to the strength of various solder compositions. http://alasir.com/reference/solder_alloys/ On the top table, not the approximately 80% increase in tensile strength for solder compositions that include silver. Although I do it often, I'm not a big fan of mixing solders. I'm actually thinking of using aluminum tubing and silver plating the joint areas. I've seen a video on doing this, although they used copper in the video they say it works with aluminum and allows it to be soldered easily if plated thick enough. If you build the loop in sections, such as in the original article I cited: http://www.nonstopsystems.com/radio/frank_radio_antenna_magloop.htm plating the loop in sections is easy. Plating a single piece loop, made on a tubing bender, is not so easy. I've copper plated aluminum tubing, but haven't had a need to try silver. No advice, but I suggest you calculate the skin depth and make sure your plating is thick enough. Tuning capacitors are usually aluminum so I'm thinking it would be better with all the same material as long as there aren't any chemical reactions between the aluminum and the solder. I've been told aluminum likes to mess with other metals. Visit your local hardware store and you'll find all kinds of bonded copper to aluminum lugs, adapters, crimps, corrosion inhibitors etc. Al to Cu transitions are common problem in house wiring. You can plate copper on aluminum yourself, but it usually requires an initial zinc coating: http://www.finishing.com/0400-0599/555.shtml I've copper plated aluminum foil, but nothing heavy or large. Again, I suggest you want your skin depth (plating to 3 times the skin depth is good enough). Personally, I think you're overdoing it and are hung up on minutiae and detail. Optimizing the loop resistance to the last remaining decimal point might be useful after you have a reproducible initial design, or if you're trying to build the ultimate magnetic loop antenna. However, the various dimensional aspects of the design are far more important. How big a loop? How to match it to 50 ohms? What's the takeoff angle? Tuning range and bandwidth? Start he http://www.aa5tb.com/loop.html http://www.aa5tb.com/aa5tb_loop_v1.22a.xls See Note 2. Good luck. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WWVH Transmitting Antennas for Time and Frequency | Shortwave | |||
beverage antennas for transmitting? | Antenna | |||
Loop Antennas | Antenna | |||
Had to fix my TS440SAT, cracked solder joints on a transistor | Homebrew | |||
PRO-2004 Dry Solder Joints | Scanner |