A moderated group?
 

Is there any need for a moderated version of uk.radio.amateur, when the most
voluble of the proponents for it are the main producers of atrocious,
infantile and grossly offensive posts that create the very cesspit in
uk.radio.amateur against which they rail?

Hypocrisy reigns when it is those proponents who shout down any and every
technical
thread despite their false claim to be wanting to discuss technical matters
in an
environment where such abuse is absent

A moderated group?
 

On 11/28/2015 3:47 AM, gareth wrote:
Is there any need for a moderated version of uk.radio.amateur, when the most
voluble of the proponents for it are the main producers of atrocious,
infantile and grossly offensive posts that create the very cesspit in
uk.radio.amateur against which they rail?

Hypocrisy reigns when it is those proponents who shout down any and every
technical
thread despite their false claim to be wanting to discuss technical matters
in an
environment where such abuse is absent

If for no other reason, to exclude you and you minions.

A moderated group?
 

On 28/11/2015 14:11, John S wrote:
On 11/28/2015 3:47 AM, gareth wrote:

snip

If for no other reason, to exclude you and you minions.

Interesting miss use of the word 'you'. Have we seen this before somewhere?


--
Spike

"Crime butchers innocence to secure a throne, and innocence struggles
with all its might against the attempts of crime"

- Maximilien Robespierre