![]() |
|
Smith Charts
ATU setting up seems to be a matter of suck-it-and-see, even
on the part of the auto ATUs (which are made for for CBers-masquerading-as-radio-amateurs because _REAL_ radio amateurs have no qualms about twiddling knobs themselves) I wonder if anyone takes a more scientifc approach by measurement and then calculation, such as by Smith Chartification? |
Smith Charts
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
ATU setting up seems to be a matter of suck-it-and-see, even on the part of the auto ATUs (which are made for for CBers-masquerading-as-radio-amateurs because _REAL_ radio amateurs have no qualms about twiddling knobs themselves) REAL radio amateurs know that the best place for an antenna tuner is at the base of the antenna, which makes "twiddling knobs" a bit difficult. I wonder if anyone takes a more scientifc approach by measurement and then calculation, such as by Smith Chartification? Such would require increased complexity in the hardware and software and also require periodic calibration. Ever heard of the KISS principal? -- Jim Pennino |
Smith Charts
|
Smith Charts
|
Smith Charts
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artÃ*culo , escribió: Ever heard of the KISS principal? Ever heard of a spell checker? It's *principle*. Your posts would carry more weight if you took a moment to proof-read them. It is posts like yours that prevent me from wasting the time to proof read USENET posts as I figure there will always be some anal retentive fixated on pointing out common typos. -- Jim Pennino |
Smith Charts
"Issued with Damages ..." wrote in message
... On 22/02/2016 19:08, wrote: In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote: ATU setting up seems to be a matter of suck-it-and-see, even on the part of the auto ATUs (which are made for for CBers-masquerading-as-radio-amateurs because _REAL_ radio amateurs have no qualms about twiddling knobs themselves) REAL radio amateurs know that the best place for an antenna tuner is at the base of the antenna, which makes "twiddling knobs" a bit difficult. I wonder if anyone takes a more scientifc approach by measurement and then calculation, such as by Smith Chartification? Such would require increased complexity in the hardware and software and also require periodic calibration. Ever heard of the KISS principal? Keep It Stupidly Simple ... ??? Jim, I'd killfiled Jim Pendulumino because he's like a Yank version of Brian Reay M3OSN. That is, always pooh-poohing, always sneering. always free with rude comments and without a kind word for anyone. |
Smith Charts
|
Smith Charts
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:53:18 -0000
"gareth" wrote: That is, always pooh-poohing, always sneering. always free with rude comments and without a kind word for anyone. Oh, the irony. |
Smith Charts
"gareth" wrote in
: "Issued with Damages ..." wrote in message ... On 22/02/2016 19:08, wrote: In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote: ATU setting up seems to be a matter of suck-it-and-see, even on the part of the auto ATUs (which are made for for CBers-masquerading-as-radio-amateurs because _REAL_ radio amateurs have no qualms about twiddling knobs themselves) REAL radio amateurs know that the best place for an antenna tuner is at the base of the antenna, which makes "twiddling knobs" a bit difficult. I wonder if anyone takes a more scientifc approach by measurement and then calculation, such as by Smith Chartification? Such would require increased complexity in the hardware and software and also require periodic calibration. Ever heard of the KISS principal? Keep It Stupidly Simple ... ??? Jim, I'd killfiled Jim Pendulumino because he's like a Yank version of Brian Reay M3OSN. That is, always pooh-poohing, always sneering. always free with rude comments and without a kind word for anyone. Sounds like many "Class A's" hereabouts. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com