Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
Hi. Can anyone recommend a source of 36:50 ohm ununs? I'm adding an inverted L for 160 meters and would like to add an unun of 36 ohm to 50 ohms to reduce my SWR. EZNEC shows it would lower it substantially and when you're running barefoot on 160 you need all the help you can get. One gotcha on this: before you add such an unun, make sure that your feedpoint impedance is actually close to 36 ohms. It may not be, depending on your actual soil and ground-plane impedance and losses, and an unun of this sort might actually make matters worse. Yes, I'm considering that, and figure if it occurs I'll add more radials. One of the local ham clubs has a regular Field Day practice of sending up a quarter-wave vertical wire, attached to a helium balloon, to operate on 160 meters at night. They had planned to use an unun of around that ratio to match it to the feedline... but when they tried, it made the SWR at the transmitter rather worse. I suggested that since they'd only run four radials (along the ground surface), they had a rather poor ground plane and probably had quite a few ohms of ground-loss resistance at the feedpoint. The simple assumption of "quarter-wave vertical over a perfect ground plane" just didn't apply very well. I think they just chose to drive the antenna directly and live with the SWR on the line. It's possible that they chose to hook up the unun "backwards". Depending on the soil, and radials installed below your Inverted L, you might encounter the same issue. And, depending on your soil type and weather, it's possible that your ground losses might vary quite a bit over the course of a year. Adding an adjustable transmatch right at the base of the antenna would have been a more flexible solution for them - not as broadband as an unun, but more adaptable to different ground-loss conditions. Might work for you, too (although I grant it's likely to need a rather large inductor!) Large Inductors aren't a problem - keeping a tuner weathertight on BC's wet coast is, however. Also... I'd suggest calculating the actual "excess loss" in your coax, if you accept the mismatch at the feedpoint and match to 50 ohms at the rig. At 2 MHz I'd guess that the excess loss from even a 2:1 SWR would be quite low. How do I calculate "excess loss? (My copy of "Reflections" is at home, and I can't recall whether Walt Maxwell W2DU provides a winding formula for a 36:50, if that's actually what you do turn out to need. I'll try to remember to check. My guess is that you'd probably end up having to wind your own.) Thanks - I'll see if I can find a copy. -- bobrsmits.ca |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Can anyone recommend a radio? | Homebrew | |||
Toroid material for SWL baluns/ununs. | Shortwave | |||
someone please recommend me a scanner | Scanner | |||
"Ununs" = 'UN' to 'UN' { Unbalanced-to-Unbalanced Matching Transformer } | Shortwave | |||
Recommend Scanner | Scanner |