I found a copy of the Technician class exam question pool which seems to
be from the ARRL study guide. It is in a great format with the answers
along the margin so you can hide them easily. But the only list of
questions I can find for the General class has the answers immediately
above the questions so it is hard to hide them.

Anyone know of similar question pool lists for the General and Extra
classes?

--

Rick C

In article , rickman wrote:
I found a copy of the Technician class exam question pool which seems to
be from the ARRL study guide. It is in a great format with the answers
along the margin so you can hide them easily. But the only list of
questions I can find for the General class has the answers immediately
above the questions so it is hard to hide them.

Anyone know of similar question pool lists for the General and Extra
classes?

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Gener...CLM_8th_ed.pdf

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Extra...Studyguide.pdf

On 8/29/2016 4:23 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
In article , rickman wrote:
I found a copy of the Technician class exam question pool which seems to
be from the ARRL study guide. It is in a great format with the answers
along the margin so you can hide them easily. But the only list of
questions I can find for the General class has the answers immediately
above the questions so it is hard to hide them.

Anyone know of similar question pool lists for the General and Extra
classes?

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Gener...CLM_8th_ed.pdf

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Extra...Studyguide.pdf

Hey, thanks. I followed every link I could find on their site and
didn't find these. Great! I'm thinking I'll just study and get all
three and not have to bother with going back to take them one at a time.

--

Rick C

In article , rickman wrote:

Hey, thanks. I followed every link I could find on their site and
didn't find these. Great! I'm thinking I'll just study and get all
three and not have to bother with going back to take them one at a time.

Not a bad idea! Most of the VE groups will let you take all three
tests for a single fee (assuming that you keep passing).

That being said: I'm not a fan of "study just the test questions, and
cram the answers" approach to getting a ham license. A lot of people
do get their Technician licenses that way, but they tend to be
somewhat lost afterwards - they often don't understand the "why"
behind the answer.

This may be OK for a Technician who just wants to communicate with
family and friends on a pre-programmed radio, but it doesn't work so
well at the General and Extra levels. Even at the Tech level, a fair
number of people who get their ticket after a one-day Ham Cram session
never seem to get on the air.

For the Amateur and Extra licenses, at least, I'd recommend getting
the ARRL license manuals and actually reading through them at least
once (you might be able to get current copies of the current manuals
through a public library, or from someone who has recently passed the
exams).

If you've got a solid understanding of radio and electronics theory
already, this may not be necessary, at least for the questions in
these areas. There's still a fair bit of material in the General and
Extra exams which relates to legal issues e.g. third-party communication,
power levels, emission modes vs. frequency bands, RF exposure, etc.,
where you tend to need a combination of "understand the background of
the topic" and "memorize the specific details of what's in the current
regulations, which may not make any real sense but are Just So."

On 8/30/2016 1:08 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
In article , rickman wrote:

Hey, thanks. I followed every link I could find on their site and
didn't find these. Great! I'm thinking I'll just study and get all
three and not have to bother with going back to take them one at a time.

Not a bad idea! Most of the VE groups will let you take all three
tests for a single fee (assuming that you keep passing).

That being said: I'm not a fan of "study just the test questions, and
cram the answers" approach to getting a ham license. A lot of people
do get their Technician licenses that way, but they tend to be
somewhat lost afterwards - they often don't understand the "why"
behind the answer.

This may be OK for a Technician who just wants to communicate with
family and friends on a pre-programmed radio, but it doesn't work so
well at the General and Extra levels. Even at the Tech level, a fair
number of people who get their ticket after a one-day Ham Cram session
never seem to get on the air.

For the Amateur and Extra licenses, at least, I'd recommend getting
the ARRL license manuals and actually reading through them at least
once (you might be able to get current copies of the current manuals
through a public library, or from someone who has recently passed the
exams).

If you've got a solid understanding of radio and electronics theory
already, this may not be necessary, at least for the questions in
these areas. There's still a fair bit of material in the General and
Extra exams which relates to legal issues e.g. third-party communication,
power levels, emission modes vs. frequency bands, RF exposure, etc.,
where you tend to need a combination of "understand the background of
the topic" and "memorize the specific details of what's in the current
regulations, which may not make any real sense but are Just So."

I'm an EE, so I have a lot of electronics background even if I'm not
really an RF guy. I'm going through the ARRL review for the General
license now. One question that is stumping me is about FM bandwidth.
Here is the question.

What is the total bandwidth of an FM phone transmission having 5 kHz
deviation and 3 kHz modulating frequency?

The correct answer is 16 kHz, (3 kHz + 8 kHz) * 2. But I don't get why.
The only page I've found so far that tries to explain refers to
"heterodyning" the carrier, the audio bandwidth and the maximum
deviation, Df. Df is not really a signal, it is just a parameter
describing the RF signal. Further, there is no hetreodyning.

Am I just getting hung up on terminology?

As to cramming the questions, I'm not sure I will ever use the license
to transmit. I think I'm just getting it to be able to say I have it.
I might learn Morse code as well, just for street creds.

Mostly I want to build receivers.

--

Rick C

In article , rickman wrote:

What is the total bandwidth of an FM phone transmission having 5 kHz
deviation and 3 kHz modulating frequency?

The correct answer is 16 kHz, (3 kHz + 8 kHz) * 2. But I don't get why.
The only page I've found so far that tries to explain refers to
"heterodyning" the carrier, the audio bandwidth and the maximum
deviation, Df. Df is not really a signal, it is just a parameter
describing the RF signal. Further, there is no hetreodyning.

Am I just getting hung up on terminology?

A bit, but your concern is reasonable - for FM you aren't
heterodyning, and the rules are a bit different.

FM modulation is mathematically more complex than AM/SSB. AM and SSB
involve multiplication of two sines (the carrier and the content) and
you end up with precisely two sidebands per content-tone (at
carrier+tone and carrier-tone). So, the bandwidth is easy to
determine... it's twice that of the highest frequency in the content
signal (for AM) and half that for SSB.

FM is trickier. If you work out the formula for the instantaneous
value of the RF carrier (given an information signal of a given
frequency and maximum carrier deviation) you end up with a "sine of a
sine" equation, and this is *not* as "well behaved".

In principle, the actual occupied bandwidth of an FM-modulated carrier
is *infinite*. If you FM a carrier with a 1 kHz tone, the resulting
RF spectrum contains discrete sidebands at 1 kHz offsets from the
carrier frequency, in both directions, going out "forever".

Fortunately for us all, the amplitudes of these sidebands drop off
very sharply once you get out beyond the maximum instantaneous
deviation of the carrier. The actual amplitudes of the sidebands are
the results of the Bessel functions.

So, we don't have to treat the occupied bandwidth as literally
infinite... we just treat it as the portion of the spectrum that has
enough energy in it that would interact with other transmissions.

What we tend to use (for most audio-modulated FM) is what's known as
Carson's rule (or rule-of-thumb). Add together the peak deviation,
and the bandwidth of the modulating signal, and that's the amount of
spectrum you need on each side of the carrier. So, you double this
number to get "occupied bandwidth".

So - a voice-audio signal of DC - 3 kHz, modulating an FM carrier by
up to +/-5 kHz, requires 2*(3+5) KHz of bandwidth, or 16k. Running FM
voice channels on 20 kHz separations is thus practical. In areas
where hams use 15 kHz channelization, it's best practice to keep peak
deviation down to 3.5 kHz or so.