Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Walter,
In MY kitchen I have two workhorses, comprising the - Autek Research, RF Analyst, Model RF-1, Frequency range 1.1 - 36 Mhz and the - MFJ, HF/VHF SWR Analyser Model 259-B, Frequency range 1.8 - 170 MHz. Both were made in the USA. I bought the 2nd one in the hope it might be better than the first. It wasn't. Nevertheless, between them they are the best things since sliced bread. The last measurements made using them were of soil impedance vs frequency, in the kitchen sink, on samples from my backyard. And the accuracy of any instrument depends on how it is used rather than on what the manufacturer says about it. ---- Reg, G4FGQ ================================ "Walter Maxwell" wrote And Reg, in conjunction with the HP-8405 Vector Voltmeter, the HP-778D dual directional coupler can measure SWR from 1 MHz to 1 GHz with no transmission line whatever. This combination is the workhorse of my RF Lab. Walt |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Walter, W2DU wrote:
"Is it possible that Geoff`s business is a spinoff grom Gates?" Harris Intertype Corporation, predecessor of Harris Electronics, axquired Quincy, IL`s Gates Radio in the 1950`s, I believe. Then Harris really hit the acquisition trail. It acquired R.F. Communications, a 2-way radio manufacturer. It also acquired a telephone and SCADA equipment manufacturer, which had a government equipment and semiconductor division in Florida. It acquired Farinon Electric a microwave manufacturer in California. There were other acquisitions, Lanier which made office equipment such as duplicators. It acquired a hardware manufacturer which made 19-inch equipment racks among its products. I don`t about other shuffles in Harris` portfolio of companies, but the companies it bought were among the best at what they did at the time of acquisition. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
In brief, how can you have a conjugate match with the source impedance hopping about trying to follow the load? ;o) ---- Reg, G4FGQ Reg, I have a myriad of measurements which prove that when the pi-network is adjusted to deliver max power for any reasonable drive level into any reasonable value of load, the source impedance is the conjugate of the load impedance. When adjusting the load control of the network for max output the output resistance equals the resistance of the load. And when the plate tuning is adjusted for max out the reactance injected into the network equals the reactance opposite to that in the load. To be practical, be assurred that the tuning and loading controls are alternately adjusted continuously until they converge and the max power is delivered. Having performed these measurements many, many times, I assure you that the resulting data isn't a series of coincidences. So instead of the source impedance 'hopping about trying to follow the load', when the network is correctly adjusted, the source impedance 'finds' the load and stays put until the load is changed and the network readjusted to accomodate the new load. Walt ================================ Walt, forgive me for stating the obvious, but when operating under non-linear conditions, as tubes and transistors are, I think you'll agree that when the load resistance is changed, the tubes operating conditions also change, and so does the tube's internal resistance. I don't know exactly how you have conducted your measurements. But I suggest that when you change the load you automatically force the internal resistance to change with it. But in any case, whichever way the source changes, the basic idea of a conjugate match to an unstable source is itself not very sound. The best way of determining source impedance is to mathematically model and calculate it. It need not be accurate. It is necessary only to show that it does change. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
"Walter Maxwell" wrote If you question my statements above see the data from my measurements using professional grade instruments in either QEX, May/Jun 2001, Chapter 19 in Reflections II, ============================ The accuracy of measurements depends on who uses the instruments rather than on what the manufacturer says in his sales catalogue. I'd much prefer just to take your word for it, Walt. The manufacturer's type number is superfluous - it sounds like a gratuitous advert. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Walter, W2DU wrote:
"A conjugate match can be obtained for any loading you choose." No doubt. A conjugate match permits maximum power transfer. No other load can extract as much output as a conjugate match. Were I designing a broadcast transmitter for a 50-ohm or a 75-ohm load, I would want my money`s worth from the output devices I`ve selscted, consistent with a long useful duration. I`d design for a conjugate match at the rated load and include overload protection for an output short circuit or near short. For solid-state I`d provide overvoltage protection.in addition to overcurrent protection. Harris solid-state medium wave transmitters have a number of amplifiers supplying the output and a faulty amplifier can be easily removed from service while the remainder continue operation almost as if nothing had happened, if I read their internet pages correctly. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Reg Edwards, W4FGQ wrote:
"---when the load resistance is changed, the tube`s operating conditions also change, and so does the tube`s internal resistance." I would think that change in operating conditions result from readjustment of the amplifier, not from changing the load on it. Most of the output impedance of a Class C power amplifier tube does not come from the saturation resistance when switched on, but comes from the duration of the period in which it is switched off. Until you readjust drive, the on and off periods and even the saturation resistance of the tube remain unchanged. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Clark" wrote about the specs for Harris Broadcast Txs:
As for the specification for output impedance gone missing :-) MW-10B SPECIFICATIONS RF OUTPUT IMPEDANCE: 50 ohms, unbalanced. Other output impedances available on special order. Harris Platinum Z FM transmitter 100 ohm output impedance (unbalanced) HARRIS SW-50 A RF Output Impedance 300 ohms balanced, 2.0 to 1 maximum VSWR Well, instead of reciting their complete catalogue, it is easier to simply say I could not find any product that did not specify an output impedance, much less that others were available on special order. _____________ I won't try to soften this: your conclusion above doesn't just _appear_ to be wrong, it IS wrong. 100% wrong. The impedance published by Harris is the expected load impedance, not the tx source impedance -- which is the convention used by all OEMs of broadcast txs (at least). How do I know? I was the author of all of the brochures and technical data sheets for Harris' entire FM product line for the ten years before I retired. That any published value of impedance applied to the load impedance expected was/is universal across the product lines: AM/FM/TV. Your post above showing 100 ohms for a Platinum Z FM tx also is wrong. It is designed for a 50 ohm load. Here is a link to an on-line brochure for the current 10kW model: http://www.broadcast.harris.com/prod.../HAR173569.pdf Observe the statement at the bottom of the right column on the last page thereof, which I quote below for your convenience: "All specifications referenced to any single output frequency (87.5-108MHz), nominal rated output power, and 50 ohm, isolated, non-reactive load." No other RF impedance spec is given in the very detailed list of specs contained in these brochures. Kindly recant your accusations. RF |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
"Walter Maxwell" wrote to R. Fry:
I'm not at all familiar with the circuitry used in solid-state amps, please interpret my comments accordingly. __________ Understand, and will keep that in mind. However I won't be reading/responding to anything for the next few days, as I'll be taking a short "R&R" trip. RF |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
"Walter Maxwell"
When I bought the tx for new BC stn WCEN in 1948 it was from Gates Radio in Quincy. Is it possible that Geoff's business is a spinoff from Gates? Yes, Harris-Intertype (later just "Harris Corp") bought Gates Radio, lock, stock and barrel -- not a spinoff. Don Peterson, developing the use of TDR for finding discontinuities in RF feed lines for TV. He developed a kit for use in the field for locating ghost problems in the lines connecting the tx to the antenna. Were you aware of Don's work in this area? Vaguely. My primary contact and mentor was Dr Matti Siukola, lead engineer at RCA's antenna lab and test range at Gibbsboro, NJ. Under his direction I was responsible for updating and improving the VHF and UHF RF pulse test sets used by RCA Field Service. RF |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Richard,
I don't have anything to do with broadcasting, but when I first ran across their DX line of AM transmitters, it really blew my mind. It seems though, that it is really hard to find detailed info on them. Do you have a link that describes what happens in some detail. The best I have been able to come up with was anecdotal data let to from the WLW web site. There must be some article that was published in some trade magazine. My questions a The 50 KW transmitter supposedly has 60 some modules of about 1KW each. How does this jive with being able to get the 200KW PEP that is required for 100% upward modulation? Does the combiner add voltage or power? Seems like it would be voltage, but then the impedance a module sees would depend on how many are active at a given time. What is the digital sampling rate? Seems to me they need a high power bandpass filter to get rid of the sampling frequency after the combiner. BTW, I think a lot of people are going to confuse this with Digital AM. Tam/WB2TT "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... "Richard Clark" wrote about the specs for Harris Broadcast Txs: As for the specification for output impedance gone missing :-) MW-10B SPECIFICATIONS RF OUTPUT IMPEDANCE: 50 ohms, unbalanced. Other output impedances available on special order. Harris Platinum Z FM transmitter 100 ohm output impedance (unbalanced) HARRIS SW-50 A RF Output Impedance 300 ohms balanced, 2.0 to 1 maximum VSWR Well, instead of reciting their complete catalogue, it is easier to simply say I could not find any product that did not specify an output impedance, much less that others were available on special order. _____________ I won't try to soften this: your conclusion above doesn't just _appear_ to be wrong, it IS wrong. 100% wrong. The impedance published by Harris is the expected load impedance, not the tx source impedance -- which is the convention used by all OEMs of broadcast txs (at least). How do I know? I was the author of all of the brochures and technical data sheets for Harris' entire FM product line for the ten years before I retired. That any published value of impedance applied to the load impedance expected was/is universal across the product lines: AM/FM/TV. Your post above showing 100 ohms for a Platinum Z FM tx also is wrong. It is designed for a 50 ohm load. Here is a link to an on-line brochure for the current 10kW model: http://www.broadcast.harris.com/prod.../HAR173569.pdf Observe the statement at the bottom of the right column on the last page thereof, which I quote below for your convenience: "All specifications referenced to any single output frequency (87.5-108MHz), nominal rated output power, and 50 ohm, isolated, non-reactive load." No other RF impedance spec is given in the very detailed list of specs contained in these brochures. Kindly recant your accusations. RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR meter kaput? | Antenna | |||
Conjugate matching and my funky VSWR meter | Antenna | |||
10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |