|
EH-antenna: sensation or fraude?
EH-antenna: sensation or fraude?
I have been reading about the EH-antenna on many web sites and in magazines, but they were only "kitchen recipies" of how to build it - without any theoretical explanation. Practical result reports were mostly contradictory - from being equal to a full size dipole, to statements that the antenna does not radiate at all, but the coaxial lead does. The other day I ran across the EH-antenna home web site (http://EH-antenna.com) where finally I could find the expected theory - which left me embarassed. It comes out that the EH antenna uses an until now unknown kind of magnetic field - completely different from the usual H-field. "The EH-antenna is a revolutionary concept because it does not fit the classical theory" - I can read on that Web-site. In a classical dipole the phase-shift between the E and the H field is 90 degrees. In the EH-antenna it is 0 (zero) degrees! A certain Russian phisicist Vladmir Korobeynikov reworked the famous Maxwell's four equations and they are now called "enhanced ones". Possibly he will be candidated for the Nobel prize in physics (!?). Since magnetic force-lines are closed and cannot be cut apart, underwater EH-antennas allegedly work equally well - a bonanza for submarines! It also seems that those force-lines spread across the whole Universe in zero time - which challenges the Einstein's theory of the limited speed of light to 300 000 km/sec. If all this is only partly true, this will be the greatest discovery after Heinrich Herz discovered radio waves 130 years ago. They also say that the best communication is made between the two EH-antennas. Has anybody tried that already? I do not wish to be a primitive Earthian who does not accept progress in science; however, life has taught me to be cautious. I would like to read an official report about the EH-antenna phenomenon from a competent scientific institution, a University, a research laboratory, or similar. Any comments? Bozidar, 9a2hl |
"Bozidar Pasaric" wrote in message et.hr... EH-antenna: sensation or fraude? I have been reading about the EH-antenna on many web sites and in magazines, but they were only "kitchen recipies" of how to build it - without any theoretical explanation. Practical result reports were mostly contradictory - from being equal to a full size dipole, to statements that the antenna does not radiate at all, but the coaxial lead does. The other day I ran across the EH-antenna home web site (http://EH-antenna.com) where finally I could find the expected theory - which left me embarassed. It comes out that the EH antenna uses an until now unknown kind of magnetic field - completely different from the usual H-field. And the crap begins to flow, now that classical physics has been slain. Ed wb6wsn |
|
"Bozidar Pasaric" wrote in message et.hr... EH-antenna: sensation or fraude? Neither. Joke. The three great unatainable holy grails.... Perpetual motion A new revolutionary type of antenna (much smaller and more efficent and whatever else you want) A better way to drive to work. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
i found the better way to drive to work... fuzzy slippers from bedroom to
office. "Steve Nosko" wrote in message ... "Bozidar Pasaric" wrote in message et.hr... EH-antenna: sensation or fraude? Neither. Joke. The three great unatainable holy grails.... Perpetual motion A new revolutionary type of antenna (much smaller and more efficent and whatever else you want) A better way to drive to work. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:24:04 -0000, "Dave" wrote:
i found the better way to drive to work... fuzzy slippers from bedroom to office. Hi Dave, I couldn't let that pass without recalling one of Scott Adams' Dilbert home pages from years ago. He took a picture of his bedroom door from bed and commented: "This is my commute, when I go through that door I am at work." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:24:04 -0000, "Dave" wrote: i found the better way to drive to work... fuzzy slippers from bedroom to office. Hi Dave, I couldn't let that pass without recalling one of Scott Adams' Dilbert home pages from years ago. He took a picture of his bedroom door from bed and commented: "This is my commute, when I go through that door I am at work." That's the good news here, too. It's also the bad news. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Bozidar,
Established physics is "old primitive Earthian". The 'EH' antenna is classified as "concave futuristic Earthian". Apply that label with an erasable marker... 'Doc PS - Erecting an 'EH' antenna over your garden will allow you to skip fertilizing for at least two years. As an added bonus, it cures male pattern baldness... |
And the crap begins to flow, now that classical physics has been slain. Ed wb6wsn Physics? You want physics? I'll show you physics :-) "The voltage and current applied to a Hertz antenna are in phase, therefore the E and H fields are not in phase, thus radiation does not occur until a great distance from the antenna. A proper phase shift network allows the Hertz antenna to become an EH Antenna where a 90 degree phase delay between the current and voltage applied to the antenna cause the E and H fields to be in phase, therefore the EH antenna is able to transfer power from the transmitter directly to radiation. This is the basis of the EH Antenna patent." http://www.eh-antenna.com/library/EH...DEFINITION.pdf |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com