Richard Clark wrote:
Hence, the first statement above was a troll.

Nope, just a statement of fact, contradicting W8JI's assertion that
the current has to be the same at both ends of a coil in order to
satisfy Kirchhoff's laws. I'm finding it hard to ascertain which
side you are on, Richard - reality or W8JI's? Come to think of it,
the only thing upon which you have ever disagreed with me is
my style, not my technical assertions.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

For those who really want to learn
about loading coils on small antennas, go to Tom
Rauch's web page and learn how a real engineer deals with
the problem.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


Yea, that current across the coil is constant.
Can you specify what engineering degree Tom has, from what school?

Yuri

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:53:00 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

reality or W8JI's? Come to think of it,
the only thing upon which you have ever disagreed with me is
my style, not my technical assertions.

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:53:00 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Come to think of it, the only thing upon which you have ever disagreed with me is
my style, not my technical assertions
which side you are on, reality or your own?

Tom Donaly wrote:
Since when has anyone claimed it's impossible to make a coil that
has a non-constant current distribution?

Tom, W8JI claimed such in the following quote from eHam.net:

"If you look at HOW an inductor works, the current flowing in
one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out the other
terminal."

Maybe you should catch up on the argument before you expose your
ignorance of the argument any farther. Tom's above assertion is
what the argument was/is all about. Your posting proves that you
are ignorant of what the argument is all about.

You guys sure go out of your way to pat yourselves on the back
for proving something no one has ever argued about.

You are continuing to exhibit your ignorance. W8JI (your hero)
asserted the above quotation that the current flowing in one terminal
of an inductor "ALWAYS" equals the current flowing out the other
terminal. Are you going to back him up on that assertion or not?

For those who really want to learn
about loading coils on small antennas, go to Tom
Rauch's web page and learn how a real engineer deals with
the problem.

Tom Rauch is the person who made the above assertion of which you
are obviously ignorant. Please alleviate your ignorance and get
back to us. Do you really believe that, for an inductor, "the current
flowing in one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out
the other terminal"? It's a simple yes/no question and it's time
for you to $hit or get off the pot.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

For those who really want to learn
about loading coils on small antennas, go to Tom
Rauch's web page and learn how a real engineer deals with
the problem.

Yea, that current across the coil is constant.
Can you specify what engineering degree Tom has, from what school?

Not only that, can he defend this assertion of Tom Rauch in his
response to your posting on eHam.net?

"If you look at HOW an inductor works, the current flowing in one
terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out the other terminal."

Has the definition of "ALWAYS" changed while I wasn't looking?????
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Come to think of it, the only thing upon which you have ever disagreed with me is
my style, not my technical assertions

which side you are on, reality or your own?

The aliens instructed me to deliver this knowledge to earthlings.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"My patience is getting thin" was also a joke. Seems it fell flat.

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:32:22 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
The aliens instructed me to deliver this knowledge to earthlings.
Any Eric Cartman DNA in your bloodline?

Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

Since when has anyone claimed it's impossible to make a coil that
has a non-constant current distribution?


Tom, W8JI claimed such in the following quote from eHam.net:

"If you look at HOW an inductor works, the current flowing in
one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out the other
terminal."

Maybe you should catch up on the argument before you expose your
ignorance of the argument any farther. Tom's above assertion is
what the argument was/is all about. Your posting proves that you
are ignorant of what the argument is all about.

You guys sure go out of your way to pat yourselves on the back

for proving something no one has ever argued about.

You are continuing to exhibit your ignorance. W8JI (your hero)
asserted the above quotation that the current flowing in one terminal
of an inductor "ALWAYS" equals the current flowing out the other
terminal. Are you going to back him up on that assertion or not?

For those who really want to learn
about loading coils on small antennas, go to Tom
Rauch's web page and learn how a real engineer deals with
the problem.


Tom Rauch is the person who made the above assertion of which you
are obviously ignorant. Please alleviate your ignorance and get
back to us. Do you really believe that, for an inductor, "the current
flowing in one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out
the other terminal"? It's a simple yes/no question and it's time
for you to $hit or get off the pot.

Go to Tom's home page and read _everything_ he wrote about loading
coils and come back here and tell us what he really thinks.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH