Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmie wrote:
Just because it is canceld in the far field does not mean the coil did not radiate. It is generally accepted that if RF energy doesn't escape to the far- field, that energy is not "radiated". Energy can appear in the near- field around a wire without being "radiated". I would not even say it is canceled in the far field although this is a convenent way of looking at radiation. All you can really say for sure is that the out of phase voltages in the receiving antenna combine destructively. If the fields combine destructively in the near-field, that field energy is returned to the system and never reaches the receiving antenna in the far field. That's how transmission lines are supposed to work and why the spacing between the two conductors needs to be negligible compared to a wavelength. The near-balanced currents on each side of a coil, traveling in opposite directions, cause destructive interference in the near field, thus limiting the amount of energy radiated by the coil. An electrical 1/4WL helical antenna radiates slightly less RF than does a 1/4WL straight wire. That implies the amount of radiation from an air-core coil is slightly less than from a wire the same overall length as the coil. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |