Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:01:22 -0400, "G&R" makes a claim and opens
himself up to skewering: |Hi Art, | |While this was the common theory many years ago, there other ways to get |gain from an antenna other than boom length and number of elements. | |ie On 2m we are able to get 11.2 dBd on a 45inch boom with 3 elements |stacked 2 wide. Yes, this is range tested see results at |http://www.csvhfs.org/ant/CSANT04.HTML Uh Oh! The measured data show 11.2 dBd, the advertising shows 13.97 dBd. I thought maybe I went to the Raibeam site by mistake but no, I went he http://www.degendesigns.com/StackedVwave.htm I love that precision BTW. I've done a fair amount of antenna range testing using HP 8510s for measurement receivers and I've never been able to establish gain within 1/100 dB. But you can do it with a ham receiver and "subjective analysis". Congratulations. Since you're using two 45" booms spaced 58" apart, I would argue that you should compare your design to a 148" boom Yagi and see what happens. How about posting your dimensions so we can see what modeling says about them. One further note: The Dataq DI-194 mentioned at: http://www.degendesigns.com/Downloads.htm WILL NOT work with all computers. This device is powered by the serial port and my Toshiba laptops will not drive it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
Antenna future | Antenna |