Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Antenna
>
In a ground plane, what dictates the number and spacing of radials?
Reply
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
#
1
January 15th 05, 03:52 AM
Walter Maxwell
Posts: n/a
On 14 Jan 2005 11:09:33 -0800,
wrote:
Walter Maxwell wrote:
But a ground plane antenna suffers no
ground losses, so using as many as possible only applies to radials
on
or in the ground.
Walt, W2DU
Or low to the ground in terms of wavelength. But you wouldn't have to
use
"as many as possible". With most VHF/UHF ground planes, they are
usually
several waves up off the ground, and ground loss is very low. But if
you
take a low band ground plane, say 1/8 wave off the ground, you will
need
quite a few more radials than 4, to equal the benchmark of 120 radials
on
the ground. According to charts I've seen, and also backed up with real
world results, a ground plane 1/8 wave off the ground will need appx
50-60 radials to equal the 120 on the ground. At 1/4 wave up, about
8-10
or so. At 1/2 wave up, 4, 3, or just 2 radials will all work fairly
well.
Of course, I would always prefer four, over two. Even if ground loss
was
not a factor due to being high up, the decoupling of the feedline is
better with four, than two. In real world tests on VHF, I've noticed a
noticable difference going from 4 radials, to say 8 , or even 10. And
that was several waves up...So adding more radials does continue to
improve the antenna. Probably more due to the improved decoupling of
the feedline, rather than lower ground loss I would suspect...I've
heard
many a tale of disappointed hams having poor results with "low" ground
planes, and not enough radials. But thats usually on 160,80, or 40
meters.
Actually, I don't know of any ground plane users on 160, but I have
heard of quite a few on 80m..Four radials at 10 ft up on 80m, is better
than four radials on the ground, I think, but not by a large amount...
Ground loss will be fairly substantial if the ground quality is
mediocre.
In my HF experience with them, the lowest I would use four radials, and
expect *good* performance, would be at 1/4 wave up. When I would lower
the mast to 1/8 wave up, you could see quite a difference. That was on
40m, where I ran a full size GP at 36 ft at the base, on a pushup mast.
BTW, that was a great DX and late night antenna on 40m...I also had a
24 volt relay to switch a base loading coil in for 17m use as a 5/8 GP.
I changed bands here in the shack, by unplugging the transformer, for
40m use..That bypassed the 17m coil.
MK
You're quite correct, Mark, but when I mentioned 'ground plane' I'm
thinking in terms of VHF/UHF, with the antenna many wavelengths above
ground.
Thanks for clarifying my omission of terms.
Walt, W2DU
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode
Switch to Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
02:31 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks