![]() |
|
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: For instance, if an antenna is resonant on 460 MHz, multiply all the dimensions by pi to make it resonant on approximately 146.4 MHz. This is a joke, right? Not exactly - just a dash of Aquarian humor. I am serious with the question. Will "scaling it" for a bottom band of say 108 mhz make it "less efficent" at higher band? If a uhf discone is designed to cover 400-500 MHz, for instance, when you scale it to a vhf center frequency of 108 MHz, it will cover approximately 96-120 MHz. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
|
i don't have apples....only windows xp
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On 14 Jan 2005 10:59:47 -0800, wrote: I am serious with the question. Will "scaling it" for a bottom band of say 108 mhz make it "less efficent" at higher band? Only if you burn yur pi krust on the higher setting - SERIOUS! :-) By the way, what flavor pi did you pick? In the News Democrat and LEader they offer recipes for cranberries today (mmmm cranberry pi for UHF). The Kentucky NeW Era reports apples are a good bet out at Schlei's Orchards this weekend (mmmm apple pi for VHF). |
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:46:55 GMT, "Radio Man"
wrote: i don't have apples....only windows xp *** the category is pi for 2¢ *** *** Sorry, but in these rounds of Jeopardy, *** *** you must put your response in the form of a question *** tum-de-dum-dum dum-dum-dum .... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com