| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
March 7th 18, 10:07 AM
posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Separate receiving antennae?
AndyW wrote:
On 06/03/2018 16:23, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote: This is something that Spike has recommended, so perhaps a couple of loops at the bottom of the garden well away from the noise-inducing consumer electronics in this row of houses. When I, with the right moral fibre to get something that I wanted, took the Morse test at Portishead (Highbridge) Radio in 1983, and then had a guided tour of the station, the operators had a 32-position rotary switch to select one of many receiving aerials pointed to all corners of the globe. I wonder if these would have been Wullenwebers / Elephant Cages, or somewhere a field of rhombics. What's the recommendation for remote RX antennae, loops or a single whip? Why a whip? Why not something fully directional? Since you are a pi fan like me Andy, you're mistaken; Gareth's a pie fan. -- STC / M0TEY / http://twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
| FA: 3 (Three) Ranger RCI-2950 - Separate Auctions. | Swap | |||
| Connecting DAB separate to PC | Digital | |||
| Connecting DAB separate to PC | Digital | |||
| Why do some transmitters have separate power supplies? | Boatanchors | |||
![Stephen Thomas Cole[_3_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
