Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a couple of GP-9s and can tell you the gain figures are a bit
inflated and not referenced to anything. A dipole array with optimum spacing between dipoles is about the most gain for size that I have encountered in VHF/UHF antennas. For VHF, a four bay dipole array at 20ft in length has 6dBD gain omni and the GP-9 claims 8.5dB(?) from three 5/8 elements. On UHF, a 16 element dipole array has about 9.8dBD gain and the GP-9 claims 11.9dB(?) for eight 5/8 elements. Something looks fishy to me. Mike Ken Bessler wrote: OK, after the thread on PL-259 losses, I figured my system (ant gain - connector losses - coax loss) 150 mhz total net gain 1.006 DBi 450 mhz total net gain 2.797 DBi Antenna tip is 32'6" above ground My proposed system would replace the RG 58 coax pieces with a single section of Flexi 4XL and the antenna would be a Comet GP-9. The new figures a 150 mhz total net gain 7.919 DBi 450 mhz total net gain 10.553 DBi Antenna tip is 47'6" above ground 150 mhz = 6.913 db improvement 450 mhz = 7.756 db improvement Antenna tip 15 feet higher Cost - about $250 for the improvement. Now here's my question - will I notice the improvement enough? I've had several OM's tell me that on SSB, CW or HF I would but not on 2m/440 simplex and repeaters. Ken KG0WX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
dual cb antenna is it worth the trouble | Antenna |