Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Doc wrote in message . com...
Dr. Slick wrote: "(1)A properly tuned and positioned dipole will be resonant at only one frequency. (2)Double-dips are a bad sign, and the return loss suffers." (1) - Nope, just not true. (2) - Not true either. (see #1) What i meant to say was, a properly tuned simple dipole will be resonant at only one frequency and it's harmonics. My double dips were not harmonically related. With the two 'dips' not being harmonically related, it appears that there is some 'other' reason, the feed line for one, or something near the antenna (a person for instance?). 'Doc raising the height of the dipole above the ground from 3.5 to 6.5 feet was one of the things i did to fix this problem. The other one no one has guessed yet... S. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna |