Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Where are your orthogonal beams of light?

Where do you see the words "beams" in

"All of the photon energy present in these (canceled) waves
must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new direction, ..."

or are you impeaching your own evidence?

I believe the proper response is "non sequitur", i.e.
your response makes no sense at all. If your orthogonal
responses are not "beams of photons", pray tell, exactly
what are they?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP