Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gene Fuller wrote: Cecil, They were undoubtedly confused by their models, and they could not deal with reality. 73, Gene W4SZ I guess one could infer that that if G / C R / L, and R + jwL G + jwC, then perhaps there are losses. I would only add that there are probably also small currents in shunt distributed along the line. 73, ac6xg Cecil Moore wrote: Gene Fuller wrote: Try it. I believe you will find that your equality requirement on angles reduces to precisely the simple equation offer by Reg. Exactly! That's why I wonder why Ramo and Whinnery said it's an approximation. Wonder why Ramo and Whinnery say that's an approximation for low-loss lines? If the R+jwL angle is equal to the G+jwC angle, doesn't that make Z0 purely resistive? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |